4specs.com    4specs.com Home Page

PDF's and Blank Pages Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

4specs Discussion Forum » Specifications Discussions » PDF's and Blank Pages « Previous Next »

Author Message
Brian Payne
Senior Member
Username: brian_payne

Post Number: 279
Registered: 01-2014
Posted on Tuesday, September 06, 2022 - 03:49 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Good question came up this week from one of the Project Managers at work. "If nobody is printing physical spec manuals, then why insert blank pages to odd numbered sections?"

In a world of PDFs, does it matter anymore? What do you all do?
Gail Ann J. Goldstead, AIA, CSI, CCS, CDT, LEED AP, BD+C
Senior Member
Username: ggoldstead

Post Number: 37
Registered: 03-2015


Posted on Tuesday, September 06, 2022 - 03:58 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

We still include the blank page with the text: THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. There are many instances where we as well as contractors distribute single sections to team members, consultants or building trades for various reasons. It works much better to keep each spec section as a stand-alone piece.
Gail Goldstead
Brian Payne
Senior Member
Username: brian_payne

Post Number: 280
Registered: 01-2014
Posted on Tuesday, September 06, 2022 - 04:15 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Gail, thanks for the reply. Workflow question? Are you providing the contractor individual pdfs or a single pdf? If a single pdf is provided, I'm assuming the contractor just extracts the standalone pages desired and creates a new pdf. How does having/not having blank pages effect the process?
Gail Ann J. Goldstead, AIA, CSI, CCS, CDT, LEED AP, BD+C
Senior Member
Username: ggoldstead

Post Number: 38
Registered: 03-2015


Posted on Tuesday, September 06, 2022 - 04:41 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

We provide the Contractor a single Book-marked PDF.
They usually use Procore and can readily separate into individual spec sections. The Procore Program does this automatically.

By using blank pages for uneven spec sections, you can readily see you have the specific spec section without any other additional non-related info. I see how you can avoid having to do this, but you never know when people still may choose to print out any given section.
I'm just saying this is an area that we still follow traditional protocol.
Gail Goldstead
Greta Eckhardt (Unregistered Guest)
Unregistered guest
Posted on Tuesday, September 06, 2022 - 04:47 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

The simplest way to indicate that an electronic or paper copy of a section is complete without extraneous material is to type END OF SECTION XXXXXX at the end of the last piece of text. The page number on that page shows the total number of pages for the section, and one can check that all the page numbers between that and page one are present.
Dan Helphrey
Senior Member
Username: dbhelphrey

Post Number: 111
Registered: 12-2018
Posted on Tuesday, September 06, 2022 - 06:32 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

People still print a lot of hard copies. Some AHJs still require documents to be "wet" signed, which requires a hard copy, and even if no hard copy is required, many people on both the A/E side (like me) and the Contractor side will still print hard copies. Not having the first page of the next section print on the back of the last page of the section I'm printing isn't a huge thing, but it is nice.
George A. Everding, FCSI, CCS, CCCA, AIA
Senior Member
Username: geverding

Post Number: 936
Registered: 11-2004


Posted on Thursday, September 08, 2022 - 09:05 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

If a page says: "THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK" then you are intentionally not leaving it blank.

Shouldn't you really say: "This page intentionally NOT left blank"?
Lynn Javoroski FCSI CCS LEEDŽ AP SCIP Affiliate
Senior Member
Username: lynn_javoroski

Post Number: 2290
Registered: 07-2002


Posted on Thursday, September 08, 2022 - 09:50 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

George, you've expressed how I've felt for years about that comment. How about "This page intentionally has these words so nothing else can be here"
George A. Everding, FCSI, CCS, CCCA, AIA
Senior Member
Username: geverding

Post Number: 937
Registered: 11-2004


Posted on Thursday, September 08, 2022 - 11:16 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

The tyranny of self-referential statements and recursive loops.

The following statement is true.
The previous statement is false.

cf. Kurt Gödel, Raymond Smullyan, Douglas Hofstadter.
Ron Beard
Senior Member
Username: rm_beard_ccs

Post Number: 485
Registered: 10-2002


Posted on Friday, September 09, 2022 - 10:24 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

If the Section text is terminated via "END OF SECTION" terminology or by " **** " designation, why not just issue a blank page? Obviously, this applies only where odd-even page numbering is applicable.
If seems to make all of the above discussion a mute issue. There nothing to intercept one way or the other.
"Fast is good, but accurate is better."
.............Wyatt Earp
Lynn Javoroski FCSI CCS LEEDŽ AP SCIP Affiliate
Senior Member
Username: lynn_javoroski

Post Number: 2291
Registered: 07-2002


Posted on Friday, September 09, 2022 - 10:26 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

"mute" or "moot"? that is the question
Dave Metzger
Senior Member
Username: davemetzger

Post Number: 810
Registered: 07-2001
Posted on Saturday, September 10, 2022 - 03:54 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

A "mute" question?

I'm speechless.
Lynn Javoroski FCSI CCS LEEDŽ AP SCIP Affiliate
Senior Member
Username: lynn_javoroski

Post Number: 2292
Registered: 07-2002


Posted on Saturday, September 10, 2022 - 05:09 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

LOL! Exactly! If you think about it, there's a little bit of sense in using that word - not much, and it's incorrect, but I see it used a lot.
James Sandoz, AIA, CSI, CCS
Senior Member
Username: jsandoz

Post Number: 355
Registered: 06-2005
Posted on Sunday, September 11, 2022 - 10:48 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

George, I read Douglas Hofstadter's Gödel, Escher, Bach: an Eternal Golden Braid when it was first published. That book was virtually too much for a certain college freshman to absorb at the time but I have referred to my copy a few times over the past 40+ years.
Loretta Sheridan
Senior Member
Username: leshrdn

Post Number: 44
Registered: 11-2021
Posted on Monday, September 12, 2022 - 08:20 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Ditto Gail's and Dan's comments.

And why type "This Page Left Intentionally Blank" (as opposed to just leaving blank): If you are working on a computer with a PDF you know if it is actually "blank" as opposed to waiting for it to fill in. Some large files take a while to fill in as you page through a document.

As VisiSpecs and SpecLink both make it easy to add these at the end of sections, I don't see it as a problem.

The government probably came up with that phrasing -- the government is great for that sort of thing.
Greta Eckhardt (Unregistered Guest)
Unregistered guest
Posted on Monday, September 12, 2022 - 08:38 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

If one prepares a separate pdf document for each section, there are ways of compiling multiple sections so that the printer identifies the first page of each section and prints the section accordingly. There should be no need for blank pages in this day and age. Stating "END OF SECTION" on the last page of a section is a good safeguard in case printed pages get mixed up, since it has a page number on it that identifies how many pages there should be for that section.
Steven Bruneel, Retired Architect
Senior Member
Username: redseca2

Post Number: 710
Registered: 12-2006


Posted on Monday, September 12, 2022 - 03:28 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Another reason to type "This Page Left Intentionally Blank" (as opposed to just leaving blank): Contractors and estimators looking at the documents become suspicious of blank pages, thinking they are missing something, or there was some sort of printing error leaving something out.
ken hercenberg
Senior Member
Username: khercenberg

Post Number: 1509
Registered: 12-2006


Posted on Monday, September 12, 2022 - 04:37 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

How about "Placeholder Page" or "Pagination Page" or "Printer's courtesy page" or "Left-handed, odd-numbered last page" or "There is no information on this page" or "See next page" or "Really, that was the End of Section"...
Brian Payne
Senior Member
Username: brian_payne

Post Number: 281
Registered: 01-2014
Posted on Monday, September 12, 2022 - 04:40 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

So in summary: I'm avoiding the <Insert Preferred Term> pages altogether and just not including them.

Thanks for the enjoyable thread. And please carry on posting here if you all would like. No reason to stop now. :-)
ken hercenberg
Senior Member
Username: khercenberg

Post Number: 1510
Registered: 12-2006


Posted on Monday, September 12, 2022 - 04:42 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

I stopped using blank pages about 15 years ago. No one ever said anything. Not once.
Lynn Javoroski FCSI CCS LEEDŽ AP SCIP Affiliate
Senior Member
Username: lynn_javoroski

Post Number: 2293
Registered: 07-2002


Posted on Monday, September 12, 2022 - 04:50 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

I like the "Really, that was the End of Section - Not kidding!"
Dan Helphrey
Senior Member
Username: dbhelphrey

Post Number: 113
Registered: 12-2018
Posted on Monday, September 12, 2022 - 09:09 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Lynn wins the Internet for today!
Loretta Sheridan
Senior Member
Username: leshrdn

Post Number: 45
Registered: 11-2021
Posted on Tuesday, September 13, 2022 - 09:17 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

"No one ever said anything. Not once."

Maybe not directly to you, but I am sure there were some subcontractors muttering under their breath.
ken hercenberg
Senior Member
Username: khercenberg

Post Number: 1511
Registered: 12-2006


Posted on Tuesday, September 13, 2022 - 10:38 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Haha. With amount of complaining I've had to put up with on-site over the years I doubt they would have held back about that.

Never met a complainer who was shy about complaining.
Lynn Javoroski FCSI CCS LEEDŽ AP SCIP Affiliate
Senior Member
Username: lynn_javoroski

Post Number: 2294
Registered: 07-2002


Posted on Tuesday, September 13, 2022 - 11:28 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Thanks, Dan. I think
Edward R Heinen CSI CDT CCS LEED-AP
Senior Member
Username: edwardheinen

Post Number: 6
Registered: 04-2022


Posted on Tuesday, September 13, 2022 - 11:46 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

As a deliverable quality standard, I'll produce project manual volumes to be both print-ready (even though they are digital/PDF) and view-ready - i.e sections are properly bookmarked for navigation. Print-ready for the reasons stated by others. I'll add "This page intentionally..." if required by owner/agency (govt. typ), but have never had an issue either way on a private project. All are automated using settings.
If a section is added/deleted to the PDF volume, the bookmark needs to be added/deleted "manually". I find having to navigate PDF drawing sets without bookmarks, with scrambled, or dysfunctional bookmarks; and having to set my own bookmarks as I scroll to be a pain. I try to encourage drawing producers to print to PDF using a view-ready quality standard (but typically using guilt-trip-complainer tactics, which oddly don't work so well...).
Leon Ruch (Unregistered Guest)
Unregistered guest
Posted on Tuesday, September 13, 2022 - 01:25 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

By default I issue a PDF package or binder (terminology varies depending on the version of Acrobat or Bluebeam). The list of files in the package serves as bookmarking, and the printer will automatically start each Section or document on the front of the paper, without the need for filler pages.
Chris Grimm, CSI, CCS, SCIP
Senior Member
Username: chris_grimm_ccs_scip

Post Number: 567
Registered: 02-2014
Posted on Thursday, September 15, 2022 - 11:58 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

I automated "blank" page insertion for odd page count spec sections quite a while back, and developed keystrokes that allow me to quickly find where they are needed and insert them where consultants did not do so. To me it just looks a LOT better in the event that someone prints a hardcopy manual. I don't know if they get printed very often, but I suspect that sometimes they still do.

As far as helping people to chop up the project manual, that is considered inadvisable or even impermissible by many architects and specifiers, due to the lack of context and loss of coordination that may tend to happen by doing so. I checked CSI Practice Guides and A201 and I don't see where it is stated to not chop up the manual. I have seen it in specifications a few times, but can't seem to put my finger on where. I did not know that Procore and similar software is actually requiring the project manual to be split up!
Ron Beard
Senior Member
Username: rm_beard_ccs

Post Number: 486
Registered: 10-2002


Posted on Monday, September 19, 2022 - 01:02 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

There are others that need hard printed copies of the Project Manual outside of contracting/estimating circles; such as banks, lending institutions, bonding companies, etc.
"Fast is good, but accurate is better."
.............Wyatt Earp
jpjordan@jordanconsultants.com (Unregistered Guest)
Unregistered guest
Posted on Monday, September 19, 2022 - 10:00 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Although I have never seen a prohibition against "chopping up" the Contract Documents (Drawings as well as specifications), the idea propably stems from the requirement to issue complete Bidding Documents back when we did hard copy (20 years ago). The idea was that the Owner and the Architect wanted Bidders to have all of the information that was required to develop a bid for the Work. This was an effort to guard against piecemeal information which might give some a reason to exclude something from a bid. This was reinforced through requirements for a deposit for each set of Bidding Documents. This deposit would be refunded for each complete set of Bidding Documents returned in good condition. Those sets in good condition would be issued to the successful Bidder for use as Contract Documents.

Most Bidders on larger projects immediately disassembled the hard copy sets to give to subbidders amd material suppliers so the system was imperfect at best. Remember this was at a time when many Owners would require that a Contractor "self perform" most of the Work so that there were not as many subcontractors as there are today.

Between 2000 and 2010, we moved away from relying entirely on hard copy (remember when diazo prints ceased to be available almost overnight in the mid 2000s?). Numerous companies that supporting bidders and subbidders began to offer documents on line so that one did not have to even download a file to print. A flooring contractor might do a takeoff for resilient base without ever seeing a set of Bidding Documents.

Increasingly, hard copy Contracting Documents are becoming an anachronism except in certain specialized cases, usually having to do with legal issues.
John W. O'Neil
New member
Username: john_oneil_csi_ccs

Post Number: 1
Registered: 09-2022
Posted on Tuesday, October 11, 2022 - 11:39 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

The final page of a spec section with the phrase THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK always seemed ridiculous, and superfluous, to me. So I only do it under duress. Setting up the pages of a Project Manual so that the first page of a spec section always occurs as a right-hand page is a nice refinement, but hardly worth the time it takes to do it, not to mention the wasted paper and the snickers the phrase usually inspires.
ken hercenberg
Senior Member
Username: khercenberg

Post Number: 1520
Registered: 12-2006


Posted on Tuesday, October 11, 2022 - 12:03 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

And then there's the fact that someone along the way will add something somewhere to throw the whole thing off anyway.

Even in the "old days" when we sent work out, the printers would slip sheet before printing with ACTUAL BLANK PIECES OF PAPER that didn't say anything on them.
John W. O'Neil
Junior Member
Username: john_oneil_csi_ccs

Post Number: 2
Registered: 09-2022
Posted on Tuesday, October 11, 2022 - 01:03 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

AIA A701 Instructions to Bidders is where the Bidders are directed to use complete sets of bidding documents in preparing bids: "§ 3.1.4 Bidders shall use complete Bidding Documents in preparing Bids. Neither the Owner nor Architect assumes responsibility for errors or misinterpretations resulting from the use of incomplete Bidding Documents."

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Username: Posting Information:
This is a public posting area. Enter your username and password if you have an account. Otherwise, enter your full name as your username and leave the password blank. Your e-mail address is optional.
Password:
E-mail:
Options: Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration