Author |
Message |
John Hunter Senior Member Username: johnhunter
Post Number: 181 Registered: 12-2005
| Posted on Monday, August 07, 2023 - 05:59 pm: | |
We're seeing lots of interest in mass timber for upcoming projects. It seems like mass timber is a sort of hybrid - it's both a structural component and a finish element. How are my learned colleagues approaching this? Are you writing the Section(s), editing the Sections prepared by the SE, or perhaps having a stand-alone Section analogous to a concrete finishing or AESS Section to deal with the finishes? |
ken hercenberg Senior Member Username: khercenberg
Post Number: 1587 Registered: 12-2006
| Posted on Monday, August 07, 2023 - 07:10 pm: | |
You might want to start here https://awc.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/tmt_toolkit.pdf There are mass timber configurations with little to no exposed wood, at least when it comes to the timber. To achieve fire resistance in IV-A construction virtually every bit of timber needs to be covered with multiple layers of gyp board. Less so in IV-B. Once you get to IV-C, the mass timber provides the protection, structure, and finish. As to who specifies what? Perhaps a long talk with your SE and designers would be a good starting point. The more decorative the exposed timber, the less you want SE specifying the finish systems and veneers. |
Anne Whitacre, FCSI CCS Senior Member Username: awhitacre
Post Number: 1481 Registered: 07-2002
| Posted on Thursday, August 24, 2023 - 01:55 pm: | |
In our office, mass timber is specified (or will be specified) by the structural engineers, but if necessary the architectural side will have input on the appearance. This isn't that much different than when we specify glue-laminated beams with an "architectural " appearance -- and we've been doing that for decades. (or for that matter in conditions where we really care about the finish on the structural concrete.) Since the structural capabilities are of foremost concern, start with that and make modifications to appearance as needed. |
|