4specs.com    4specs.com Home Page

Substitution Requests going to owner? Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

4specs Discussion Forum » Construction Contract Administration Discussions » Substitution Requests going to owner? « Previous Next »

Author Message
David G. Axt, CDT, CCS, CSI, SCIP
Senior Member
Username: david_axt

Post Number: 2009
Registered: 03-2002


Posted on Tuesday, April 04, 2023 - 12:55 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

I had a product representative email me and ask if substitution requests should go to the architect or owner. I told him absolutely the substitution requests should go to the architect.

The architect is responsible and liable for the design of the building. In some instances the architect may send the request to engineers, consultants, or the owner for their input.

The product representative told me that he has a few projects where the owner wants the requests sent to them.

I will dig further on this issue. The only thing I can think of is the owner has a web-based management system that they want to track everything.

Have you come across an instance where the owner wants the substitution requests routed to them?
David G. Axt, CDT, CCS, CSI, SCIP
Specifications Consultant
Axt Consulting LLC
Ellis C. Whitby, PE, CSI, CDT, AIA, LEED
Senior Member
Username: ecwhitby

Post Number: 544
Registered: 03-2003
Posted on Tuesday, April 04, 2023 - 01:08 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

I have had experience with the Owner deciding substitutions. When the Owner doesn't involve the AE team things can get messy. If the Owner listens to the AE team (and vice versa) projects run smoother.
ken hercenberg
Senior Member
Username: khercenberg

Post Number: 1560
Registered: 12-2006


Posted on Tuesday, April 04, 2023 - 01:58 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

I've always understood that the AOR can recommend action on substitutions but that the Owner has the final decision. Considering the AOR has the same liability for substitutions as they have for products specified in the CD's I'd say involvement is critical. Besides, most Contracts are written requiring all communication to go through the AOR. Bypassing the AOR could diminish the Owner's rights against the AOR in the event the substitution fails.

Having said all that, shouldn't the vendor be told that all of their communications have to go through the Contractor?
Ellis C. Whitby, PE, CSI Emeritus, AIA Emeritus / RETIRED
Senior Member
Username: ecwhitby

Post Number: 545
Registered: 03-2003
Posted on Tuesday, April 04, 2023 - 02:15 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Ken; You are, of course, correct: all communications, including substitutions, should go through the Contractor.
Phil Kabza
Senior Member
Username: phil_kabza

Post Number: 753
Registered: 12-2002


Posted on Tuesday, April 04, 2023 - 03:38 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

In terms of good relationship building, those vendor conversations should start with the architect. There are more than one BPM out there who go to market directly to facility owners, bypassing the architect. This probably costs them more projects than it wins.
Phil Kabza FCSI CCS AIA
SpecGuy Specifications Consultants
www.SpecGuy.com
phil@specguy.com
Nathan Woods, RA, CSI, CCCA, LEED AP
Senior Member
Username: nwoods

Post Number: 912
Registered: 08-2005


Posted on Tuesday, April 04, 2023 - 03:43 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

The definitive answer on this is that GC processes the Substitution request, forwards it to the Architect, who then forwards it to the Owner (with an additional services request if review is approved). The Owner should determine if they wish the Architect to consider the substitution or not. Once that is determined (and the additional service request is approved), then and only then does the architect commence a substitution review.

Example: Contract Docs specify Carrier as the HVAC for the air handling units. Substitution Request comes in to use Trane, offering a substantial credit to the Owner. However, the Owner, having multiple facilities and a national contract with Carrier, declines the Substitution Request because of their national interests, so the Architect returns the Substitution Request as rejected, without having to perform a review.
J. Peter Jordan
Senior Member
Username: jpjordan

Post Number: 1183
Registered: 05-2004
Posted on Wednesday, April 05, 2023 - 11:59 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

It also depends when the the whole process the substitution request is made; before execution of the Contract for Construction or after. A substitution request that is made before execution of the Contract will have to be incorporated into the Procurement Documents appropriately which is the responsibility of the design professional.
J. Peter Jordan, FCSI, AIA, CCS, LEED AP, SCIP

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Username: Posting Information:
This is a public posting area. Enter your username and password if you have an account. Otherwise, enter your full name as your username and leave the password blank. Your e-mail address is optional.
Password:
E-mail:
Options: Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration