4specs.com    4specs.com Home Page

perpendicular double-layer gyp board ... Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

4specs Discussion Forum » Archive - Product Discussions #5 » perpendicular double-layer gyp board application « Previous Next »

Author Message
Robert E. Woodburn
Senior Member
Username: bob_woodburn

Post Number: 44
Registered: 11-2010
Posted on Wednesday, May 08, 2013 - 11:29 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Though rated walls are applied as tested, for non-rated, we specify the second layer be applied perpendicular to the first, and "place first layer with ends and edges occurring over firm bearing," which implies vertical application.

A co-worker asks: "If gypsum board is 48" wide and studs are 16" on center, why not allow vertical installation of both layers with offset joints? No joints would cross. It seems like staggering the joints is enough..."

One reason for perpendicular application is tradition ("we've always done it that way"). Is there a better reason?
Ronald L. Geren, AIA, CSI, CCS, CCCA, SCIP
Senior Member
Username: specman

Post Number: 1113
Registered: 03-2003


Posted on Wednesday, May 08, 2013 - 11:57 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Comply with the requirements of the tested assembly. Some will state "vertically or horizontally," and some will state "vertically" only.
Ron Geren, AIA, CSI, CCS, CCCA, SCIP
www.specsandcodes.com
Ronald L. Geren, AIA, CSI, CCS, CCCA, SCIP
Senior Member
Username: specman

Post Number: 1114
Registered: 03-2003


Posted on Wednesday, May 08, 2013 - 12:06 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Robert, I see that I misinterpreted your post.

I don't see any other reason for doing it other than added rigidity.
Ron Geren, AIA, CSI, CCS, CCCA, SCIP
www.specsandcodes.com
Jeffrey Wilson CSI CCS
Senior Member
Username: wilsonconsulting

Post Number: 100
Registered: 03-2006
Posted on Wednesday, May 08, 2013 - 12:06 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Provisions in MasterSpec, which are presumably based on industry standard procedures, describe the method suggested by co-worker: Both layers installed vertically, w/ face layer joints offset one stud from base layer joints.
Lynn Javoroski FCSI CCS LEEDŽ AP SCIP Affiliate
Senior Member
Username: lynn_javoroski

Post Number: 1640
Registered: 07-2002


Posted on Wednesday, May 08, 2013 - 12:10 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

With non-rated partitions, the over-all height might govern in relationship to how much waste will be produced by horizontal or vertical orientation.

For example, 10 foot ceiling height could lean to horizontal installation - 5 panels. 8 foot ceiling height could benefit from vertical installation.
ken hercenberg
Senior Member
Username: khercenberg

Post Number: 515
Registered: 12-2006


Posted on Wednesday, May 08, 2013 - 12:33 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Agree with Lynn, for non-rated walls it doesn't really matter. Why not leave it up to the discretion of the Installer as long as the joints are overlapped?

For rated partitions, it used to be that only USG had tested their assemblies for horizontal and vertical installation. I don't know if that's still the case.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration