4specs.com    4specs.com Home Page

precast sill Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

4specs Discussion Forum » Archive - Product Discussions #5 » precast sill « Previous Next »

Author Message
Ellis C. Whitby, PE, CSI, AIA, LEED® AP
Senior Member
Username: ecwhitby

Post Number: 158
Registered: 03-2003
Posted on Tuesday, June 05, 2012 - 02:57 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

We have a project where the punched window openings in precast were built too tall for the windows. Both windows and precast have been constructed.

My question is: can a reinforced concrete sill 2”x10” work? Even with fiber reinforcing in addition to mesh this seems awfully thin.
John Bunzick, CCS, CCCA, LEED AP
Senior Member
Username: bunzick

Post Number: 1404
Registered: 03-2002
Posted on Monday, June 11, 2012 - 11:21 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

I agree that this seems too thin. How about some sort of head or sill extension for the window? If they're aluminum, this could work fairly easily.
Ellis C. Whitby, PE, CSI, AIA, LEED® AP
Senior Member
Username: ecwhitby

Post Number: 159
Registered: 03-2003
Posted on Tuesday, June 12, 2012 - 12:47 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Thanks.

The AE originally sugguested an aluminum sill extension among other solutions. The precast was a contractor proposal. We'll see how it plays out.
Paul Gerber
Senior Member
Username: paulgerber

Post Number: 126
Registered: 04-2010


Posted on Wednesday, June 13, 2012 - 01:45 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

I'm assuming 2" high x 10" deep?

It might work, but I would suspect very susceptible to cracking.

I would agree with John's suggestion that an extension would work much better, but my preference would be at the head and not the sill.
Ride it like you stole it!!!
Dave Metzger
Senior Member
Username: davemetzger

Post Number: 432
Registered: 07-2001
Posted on Wednesday, June 13, 2012 - 03:08 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Not only cracking due to the thin profile, but that's less than an inch of concrete cover over the mesh.

I too like the aluminum extension, as there would be a single trade responsible for filling the opening. And the extension would be finished to match the windows; a color and texture match between the thin precast member and the main panels would be dicier.
Justatim
Senior Member
Username: justatim

Post Number: 39
Registered: 04-2010
Posted on Thursday, June 14, 2012 - 09:27 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Can I assume by the alternatives under consideration that the aestheics and geometry of these windows in the wall is of minor importance? Otherwise, either the windows or wall should be rebuilt, and reuseable parts can be given to a Habitat ReStore as a charitable donation.
John Bunzick, CCS, CCCA, LEED AP
Senior Member
Username: bunzick

Post Number: 1410
Registered: 03-2002
Posted on Monday, June 18, 2012 - 11:58 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

The aesthetics may be important, but reconstruction would surely be a very large expense, and depending on the relationships, cause litigation. This may lead to poor performance on other portions of the project. Not only that, but it would be a considerable waste of resources, even if product were donated. And that presupposes that any corrective measure, such as the extension I suggested, would be unattractive - it may be just fine. Also, reordering windows or rebuilding the wall may mean the owner can't occupy the project on time. I often found, when I was doing construction contract administration, the "right" solution does not meet anyone's needs.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration