4specs.com    4specs.com Home Page

cleavage membrane v. slip sheet v. cr... Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

4specs Discussion Forum » Archive - Product Discussions #5 » cleavage membrane v. slip sheet v. crack suppression membrane « Previous Next »

  Thread Last Poster Posts Pages Last Post
  ClosedClosed: New threads not accepted on this page        

Author Message
Nathan Woods, CSI, CCCA, LEED AP
Senior Member
Username: nwoods

Post Number: 556
Registered: 08-2005


Posted on Friday, January 24, 2014 - 06:08 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

I need some help with this topic. How does a liquid applied crack isolation membrane (ANSI 118.12) actually work? Why isn't a crack in the slab transmitted through the elastomeric properties of the CIM product and thereby directly into the tile above? Why would a liquid applied product be equivelent or as effective as a sheet membrane? What I am not factoring into the equation?
Dale Roberts CSI, CCPR, CTC, LEED Green Associate
Senior Member
Username: dale_roberts_csi

Post Number: 111
Registered: 10-2005


Posted on Friday, January 24, 2014 - 07:53 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

The internal make-up of this membrane is such that movement in the concrete is not directly transferred to the tile. Although the membrane is bonded to the concrete and the tile to it, the membrane stretches where needed to prevent or reduce force transference
Nathan Woods, CSI, CCCA, LEED AP
Senior Member
Username: nwoods

Post Number: 557
Registered: 08-2005


Posted on Friday, January 24, 2014 - 08:22 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Dale, thanks for the offline response as well. In case anyone else poses this question, I will link up the YouTube video you shared with me. Pretty impressive: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXJARhU2vBE
Dale Roberts CSI, CCPR, CTC, LEED Green Associate
Senior Member
Username: dale_roberts_csi

Post Number: 112
Registered: 10-2005


Posted on Friday, January 24, 2014 - 08:34 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Remember
This test was done by a professional in a controlled test track, do not try this test on an actual job, your mileage may vary.
Mark Gilligan SE,
Senior Member
Username: mark_gilligan

Post Number: 634
Registered: 10-2007
Posted on Saturday, January 25, 2014 - 02:37 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

I assume that we are talking about a brick veneer that is otherwise anchored to a wall or backing. Otherwise do not install membrane without consultation with your engineer.
Nathan Woods, CSI, CCCA, LEED AP
Senior Member
Username: nwoods

Post Number: 558
Registered: 08-2005


Posted on Sunday, January 26, 2014 - 04:28 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Hi Mark, not quite. I was thinking about tile being thinset over concrete. In my particular scenario, I have less coverage over anchor bolts and baseplates than anticipated, so I am concerned with cracking and spalling of the concrete paving. I am going to install a crack isolation membrane and then thinset some tile over the area in question in a hope to mask any actual cracking that may occur.
Mark Gilligan SE,
Senior Member
Username: mark_gilligan

Post Number: 636
Registered: 10-2007
Posted on Sunday, January 26, 2014 - 05:38 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

I obviously did not read your initial posting carefully enough.

Generally base plates are significantly lower to allow for installation of drain pipes.

You may be more successful in dealing with your problem by installing more reinforcing in the thin portion of the slab. Consider small bar sizes or mesh. If the concrete is particularly thin you might locally replace it with concrete repair products that will also adhere to the steel.

The concrete over the base plates also serves to protect the anchor bolts and base plates from corrosion. If you do not have the desired cover or have reason to believe the covering concrete will be cracked then you should have more concern for the protection of the anchor bolts and base plates from the effects of the moisture from the building.
Nathan Woods, CSI, CCCA, LEED AP
Senior Member
Username: nwoods

Post Number: 559
Registered: 08-2005


Posted on Sunday, January 26, 2014 - 07:03 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

I am aware of all these factors. My application is base plates on top of a elevated structural deck, nominally covered by a topping slab. We planned for a 5" topping slab and 3" over the base plates, but due to owner related circumstances, the final condition will be far less than that. I appreciate your willingness to help, but I do not want to go into details on this forum, nor do I need to. I believe that I have a competent solution to the field condition. Thanks.
William C. Pegues, FCSI, CCS
Senior Member
Username: wpegues

Post Number: 896
Registered: 10-2002


Posted on Sunday, January 26, 2014 - 09:27 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Nathan,

Really best advice, regardless of your solution, is to talk to the manufacturer's of the tile setting systems that you specify. The main 3, Laticrete, Custom, Mapei, they will all respond with a specific system from the substrate up through the grout in the tile, that you should require to be single source to one of them, they will all provide you with specific products and they will all warrant their 'sandwich' of products.

Hopefully, this is your 'competent solution'.

William
William C. Pegues, FCSI, CCS, SCIP Affiliate
WDG Architecture, Washington, DC | Dallas, TX

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration