4specs.com    4specs.com Home Page

Illuminated Handrails Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

4specs Discussion Forum » Archive - Specifications Discussions #5 » Illuminated Handrails « Previous Next »

Author Message
Ronald J. Ray, RA, CCS, CCCA
Senior Member
Username: rjray

Post Number: 131
Registered: 04-2004
Posted on Wednesday, November 12, 2014 - 10:34 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

I can't seem to find a narrow scope section number and title for illuminated handrails. From the limited information I can find, it is probably 05736_. Also, if anyone has a section they would care to share, I would appreciate it. ronald-ray@sbcglobal.net

Thanks
Nathan Woods, CSI, CCCA, LEED AP
Senior Member
Username: nwoods

Post Number: 610
Registered: 08-2005


Posted on Wednesday, November 12, 2014 - 11:49 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

I had a frustrating public bid job with exterior stainless steel illuminated handrails. Though the light fixture schedule clearly called them out, but they were specified in Division 5, so the electrician excluded them. It is likely the electrical contractor will be the installer, so I suggest specifying them accordingly.

Yes, I know that entire thought process is fundamentally wrong. But if you can help the poor architect during the CA phase, we'd all appreciate it.
Lynn Javoroski FCSI CCS LEEDŽ AP SCIP Affiliate
Senior Member
Username: lynn_javoroski

Post Number: 1913
Registered: 07-2002


Posted on Wednesday, November 12, 2014 - 12:16 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

There's an ArchiteXt's cartoon that addresses this from 08-23-13. http://architexts.us/ "Construction Administration: Details".
Sheldon Wolfe
Senior Member
Username: sheldon_wolfe

Post Number: 810
Registered: 01-2003


Posted on Wednesday, November 12, 2014 - 12:24 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

http://architexts.us/2013/08/23/construction-administration-details/
Ronald L. Geren, FCSI, AIA, CCS, CCCA, SCIP
Senior Member
Username: specman

Post Number: 1278
Registered: 03-2003


Posted on Wednesday, November 12, 2014 - 12:31 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Nathan, if the electrical drawings show a circuit to the illuminated handrails, the electrical sub should not have left them out--unless the issue was specifically the installation of he illuminated handrails, themselves. If that was the case, then a reference to the illuminated handrails section from the interior or exterior light section may be appropriate.

As for Ronald's question (great name, by the way), Section 05 73 23 "Illuminated Decorative Metal Railings" would be an option.
Ron Geren, FCSI, AIA, CCS, CCCA, SCIP
www.specsandcodes.com
Nathan Woods, CSI, CCCA, LEED AP
Senior Member
Username: nwoods

Post Number: 611
Registered: 08-2005


Posted on Wednesday, November 12, 2014 - 12:31 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Bingo!

However, in my case, the Owner's Division 1 had a lovely clause about the hierarchy of documents, putting the spec above the drawings. The Lying, Cheating, Scoundrel Public Bid Contractor used that to great effect on this project.
Nathan Woods, CSI, CCCA, LEED AP
Senior Member
Username: nwoods

Post Number: 612
Registered: 08-2005


Posted on Wednesday, November 12, 2014 - 12:33 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Trust me Ron, I argued rigorously and righteously. But in this case, the Owner and contractor shared a....lets call it a "shared country of origin allegiance" that trumped right and wrong.
J. Peter Jordan
Senior Member
Username: jpjordan

Post Number: 786
Registered: 05-2004
Posted on Wednesday, November 12, 2014 - 04:15 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

I will also say that there is the doctrine of unjust enrichment. The Owner pays for what he gets, and if the Contractor really didn't included that in his original bid, he probably should get paid for it.

The critical problem is how to prove that the Contractor did not include it. I wonder how many times the Contractor gets paid twice for doing the same crappy work. Oops; did I really say that?
J. Peter Jordan
Senior Member
Username: jpjordan

Post Number: 787
Registered: 05-2004
Posted on Wednesday, November 12, 2014 - 04:15 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

I have come to the conclusion that there is a time in CA to be reasonable and professional; there is also a time to jump up and down and cuss and scream. If the Contractor gets to do it, why not the Architect? Guess that's why they don't let me go to meetings.

It is on the Drawings and in the specs so what does the Contractor always get to pick and choose what parts of the Work required he does and which parts he doesn't?

Some Owners get this, but a lot don't.
Louis Medcalf, FCSI, CCS
Senior Member
Username: louis_medcalf

Post Number: 42
Registered: 11-2010
Posted on Thursday, November 20, 2014 - 01:43 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Keep in mind that some manufactured illuminated handrails do not meet ADA requirements regarding profile and size.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration