Author |
Message |
Russ Hinkle, AIA, CDT, LEED BD+C Senior Member Username: rhinkle
Post Number: 127 Registered: 02-2006
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/696e3/696e3cd5c9cedb60ce34ae04578be50a0d725b6a" alt=""
| Posted on Tuesday, October 28, 2014 - 09:05 am: | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/afaf7/afaf7c587944f3347a60cdd08dec4552f40d22cc" alt="Edit Post" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e653/8e653d683565943477bffaaed975c36f13dc48ea" alt="Delete Post" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/150bf/150bf72df09afac169df6d0fc7a4f79056043832" alt="Print Post" |
We have a senior living housing project, 3 stories, concrete plank floor. After the stud walls are installed, a gyp / concrete floor underlayment will be installed. We specified a 4000 psi product. Owner wants to entertain cost savings options and they are interested in looking at 3000 psi options. It's been a while since I have done this type of overlay and feel like this is not a good idea, but need technical reasons why. Russ Hinkle |
Nathan Woods, CSI, CCCA, LEED AP Senior Member Username: nwoods
Post Number: 606 Registered: 08-2005
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60725/60725635bc3ca77968a24743a9e984636ca700a7" alt=""
| Posted on Tuesday, October 28, 2014 - 09:56 am: | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/afaf7/afaf7c587944f3347a60cdd08dec4552f40d22cc" alt="Edit Post" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e653/8e653d683565943477bffaaed975c36f13dc48ea" alt="Delete Post" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/150bf/150bf72df09afac169df6d0fc7a4f79056043832" alt="Print Post" |
4k products are kinda rare. They are usually in the 2-3k range. I have specified and installed this one on many Multi-family and office building floors, with no problems: Hacker Industries Firm-Fill 3310 |
Scott Piper Senior Member Username: spiper
Post Number: 10 Registered: 08-2014
| Posted on Tuesday, October 28, 2014 - 10:07 am: | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/afaf7/afaf7c587944f3347a60cdd08dec4552f40d22cc" alt="Edit Post" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e653/8e653d683565943477bffaaed975c36f13dc48ea" alt="Delete Post" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/150bf/150bf72df09afac169df6d0fc7a4f79056043832" alt="Print Post" |
I have limited recent experience with this type of underlayment as well but in my experience this was typically a 3,000 psi type product in our area. |
Justatim Senior Member Username: justatim
Post Number: 61 Registered: 04-2010
| Posted on Wednesday, October 29, 2014 - 07:18 am: | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/afaf7/afaf7c587944f3347a60cdd08dec4552f40d22cc" alt="Edit Post" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e653/8e653d683565943477bffaaed975c36f13dc48ea" alt="Delete Post" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/150bf/150bf72df09afac169df6d0fc7a4f79056043832" alt="Print Post" |
If the facility's operation requires rolling medical equipment (with those itsy bitsy wheels and heavy load) along the floor, I would insist on cement type with high psi. The lower strength products (usually gypsum) can rut from the concentrated rolling loads. One hospital that I trouble-shooted had this problem; the solution was to remove all the sheet flooring and replace the underlayment. For predominantly residential loading, the lower psi should be OK. |
|