4specs.com    4specs.com Home Page

TESTS OF RAIN SCREEN SYSTEMS Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

4specs Discussion Forum » Archive - Specifications Discussions #5 » TESTS OF RAIN SCREEN SYSTEMS « Previous Next »

Author Message
Gerard Sanchis
Senior Member
Username: gerard_sanchis

Post Number: 78
Registered: 10-2009


Posted on Tuesday, June 19, 2012 - 06:09 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Are there tests by NAAMM or others for testing rain screen walls for air and water infiltration?

In our climate we seldom design rain screens and I've never had to specify the tests.

Any help would be appreciated.
Anne Whitacre, FCSI CCS
Senior Member
Username: awhitacre

Post Number: 1275
Registered: 07-2002


Posted on Tuesday, June 19, 2012 - 08:15 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

you use the same tests you use for other curtainwalls. (either onsite or in a lab). The rainscreen just lets water get through the face -- its still not supposed to get into the building. ASTM E283 for air infiltration; ASTM E330 for structural test; AAMA 501.1 for dynamic pressure... whatever you would use for a sealed system is appropriate for a rainscreen system. plus noise reduction, thermal performance and whatever else you want. they still have to perform in rainy, windy weather...
Steven Bruneel, AIA, CSI-CDT, LEED-AP, EDAC
Senior Member
Username: redseca2

Post Number: 346
Registered: 12-2006


Posted on Tuesday, June 19, 2012 - 08:51 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

As Anne states, except:

When doing off-site lab testing in a test chamber we endeavor to add into the scope a requirement to remove the rainscreen covering and do a visual inspection for displacements that have compromised the water barrier assembly.
Anne Whitacre, FCSI CCS
Senior Member
Username: awhitacre

Post Number: 1276
Registered: 07-2002


Posted on Wednesday, June 20, 2012 - 07:36 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Steve-
you're right. I've done lab testing, and the testing was actually done before the rainscreen was installed -- since its the underlying membrane that is the water/air barrier anyway. so we did a test without the rainscreen, and then applied the rainscreen and did another test.
Steven Bruneel, AIA, CSI-CDT, LEED-AP, EDAC
Senior Member
Username: redseca2

Post Number: 347
Registered: 12-2006


Posted on Wednesday, June 20, 2012 - 07:52 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Yes. I forgot to mention we were also doing seismic testing (at the specified performance and again at +150% to see if it broke). We needed to see if the waterproof membrane had failed with all that rocking and rolling, twisting and shouting.
Gerard Sanchis
Senior Member
Username: gerard_sanchis

Post Number: 79
Registered: 10-2009


Posted on Wednesday, June 20, 2012 - 08:33 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Thank you all but remember that this is an in situ series of tests.

Would a test using the AAMA 501.2 method (water spray) replicate actual conditions of the wall when in place.

After all is said and done, the rain screen with its open joints is designed to equalize pressure in the cavity and using a pressure chamber will not duplicate the conditions at the site.
ken hercenberg
Senior Member
Username: khercenberg

Post Number: 285
Registered: 12-2006
Posted on Thursday, June 21, 2012 - 09:50 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

How do you compartmentalize the drainage plane in an open joint system?

It seems that, like Anne pointed out, the testing has to be done before the open joint 'veneer' is installed (or it needs to be taken off). After all, according to new conventional wisdom, pressure equalized rain screens aren't really pressure equalized. At the very least, for them to work, they need to be properly compartmentalized anyway so maybe that establishes the size of your testing chamber.
anon (Unregistered Guest)
Unregistered guest
Posted on Thursday, June 21, 2012 - 12:37 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

YES! AAMA has two recently developed tests for rainscreen cladding systems that I require in my specifications for these cladding systems (in climates that warrant such a system - not across the board for all climate conditions). They are AAMA 508 and AAMA 509.
Colin Gilboy
Senior Member
Username: colin

Post Number: 307
Registered: 09-2005


Posted on Friday, June 22, 2012 - 03:37 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

We have had good success with Vaproshield. They did testing with our wood rainscreen system in their own lab. They are extremely proactive and have a wide array of different drainage plane materials. I'm not sure if they will do on site testing. I hope this is helpful.

-Chris Nolan, General Woodcraft, Inc.
Colin Gilboy
Publisher, 4specs.com
435.654.5775 - Utah
800.369.8008
ken hercenberg
Senior Member
Username: khercenberg

Post Number: 287
Registered: 12-2006
Posted on Friday, June 22, 2012 - 06:09 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Thanks for forwarding Chris' post Colin.

My understanding is that Vaproshield cannot stand up to prolonged UV exposure which an open joint system will result in. Testing for their Wall Shield product is 270 days, but polypropylene is what it is.

Then again, if it's just being installed for the test, I suppose it doesn't matter. It just becomes an issue if the intent is to compartmentalize the drainage plane permanently.
Nathan Woods, CSI, CCCA, LEED AP
Senior Member
Username: nwoods

Post Number: 456
Registered: 08-2005


Posted on Friday, June 22, 2012 - 06:36 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Vaproshield sells a UV resistent tape that goes over their membrane at the joints in your rainscreen system. I have used this in a TRESPA based rainscreen system. Installation went smoothly, performance not verified yet, only recently installed.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration