4specs.com    4specs.com Home Page

Unusual Standard Units of Measurement Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

4specs Discussion Forum » Archive Coffee Pot and Water Cooler » Unusual Standard Units of Measurement « Previous Next »

Author Message
Ellis C. Whitby, AIA, PE, CSI, LEED® AP
Senior Member
Username: ecwhitby

Post Number: 77
Registered: 03-2003
Posted on Tuesday, December 14, 2010 - 02:34 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Some may be aware of various unusual standard units of measurement, such as the Puppy (p): The SI unit of happiness, puppy, is derivable as the quantity of happiness which one 1 kilogram beagle puppy whose body temperature is 310 kelvins produces when held in skin contact for one second.

There is also the “Helen” (H), the SI unit of beuaty: that amount of beauty required to launch one thousand Achaean ships of approximately eight tons empty displacement each, or approximately eight-thousand tons of shipping, and to destroy one city. The milliHelen (mH): a more convenient measure than the Helen, that amount of beauty required to launch one ship and burn down a single house.

This of course, leads to the question: What is the male equivalent of the “Helen”?

I have partial definitions for some others and believe these definitions need to expanded: For example:

Fonzie (SI measure of coolness) (F): One Fonzie is the amount of coolness generated by Arthur Fonzarelli. What would a MegaFonzie (MF) be then? {Futurama’s definition is obvious flawed]

Warhols (The SI unit of fame duration) (w): One (1) Warhol equals 15 minutes of fame. Accordingly, if you’ve been famous for three years, that’s just over 105 kilowarhols (kw). There is a critical point — varying from celebrity to celebrity — where that person has outstayed their welcome, and are in negative Warhol territory, or the Kanye. [-1 Warhol = 1 Kanye (k).]

I am confident that the denizens of this site can contribute to this cause.
Lynn Javoroski CSI CCS LEED® AP SCIP Affiliate
Senior Member
Username: lynn_javoroski

Post Number: 1166
Registered: 07-2002


Posted on Tuesday, December 14, 2010 - 02:44 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

You have waaaay too much time on your hands! But I await with bated breath the contributions to come.
Ellis C. Whitby, AIA, PE, CSI, LEED® AP
Senior Member
Username: ecwhitby

Post Number: 78
Registered: 03-2003
Posted on Tuesday, December 14, 2010 - 03:05 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Here I am contributing to the further development of science and I get dissed!
Lynn Javoroski CSI CCS LEED® AP SCIP Affiliate
Senior Member
Username: lynn_javoroski

Post Number: 1167
Registered: 07-2002


Posted on Tuesday, December 14, 2010 - 03:30 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

The Connery: (SI unit of spectacular aging): The Connery is measured in terms of the number of women who turn and stare, swoon, or sigh. One Connery is equal to 100 such reactions.

Oh, and 83 percent of all statistics are made up on the spot.
Ellis C. Whitby, AIA, PE, CSI, LEED® AP
Senior Member
Username: ecwhitby

Post Number: 79
Registered: 03-2003
Posted on Tuesday, December 14, 2010 - 03:49 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

The Connery: nice.
George A. Everding, AIA, CSI, CCS, CCCA
Senior Member
Username: geverding

Post Number: 573
Registered: 11-2004


Posted on Tuesday, December 14, 2010 - 04:59 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

BOM Scale: Basic unit of fun. Today rates as about a 0.6 on the BOM scale. I am having significantly less fun than a Barrel Of Monkeys. Here's hoping the upcoming weekend will rate at least a 2.0 BOM
George A. Everding AIA CSI CCS CCCA
Ingersoll Rand Security Technologies
St. Louis, MO
Ellis C. Whitby, AIA, PE, CSI, LEED® AP
Senior Member
Username: ecwhitby

Post Number: 80
Registered: 03-2003
Posted on Tuesday, December 14, 2010 - 05:06 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

George;

While I am sympathetic with your current BOM deficit, in the interest of completeness I must ask for clarification of your definition.

What size and construction of barrel? What number, size, age and species of monkeys? Inquiring minds want to know.

Or is the definition of BOM like the classic definition of pornography: you know it if you see it?
Anne Whitacre, FCSI CCS
Senior Member
Username: awhitacre

Post Number: 1082
Registered: 07-2002


Posted on Wednesday, December 15, 2010 - 03:30 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

okay, I've got a couple:

Palin: a measurement of how much your politcal ambitions outstrip your actual skill-set. a Mega-Palin is when you can't pronounce the words your speech writers produce for you or you just go make up words.

Snooki: a measurement that combines two things: lack of actual usefulness times amount of fame. (fame being measured by appearances on reality shows, People Magazine and the like)

Louboutin: a measurement of a woman's status and power: (calculated by the number of Louboutin pumps in her closet)

and finally,

Neruda: a Latin American calculation of a man's sexiness, based on Neruda poems committed to memory in Spanish.
Ellis C. Whitby, AIA, PE, CSI, LEED® AP
Senior Member
Username: ecwhitby

Post Number: 82
Registered: 03-2003
Posted on Wednesday, December 15, 2010 - 04:04 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Nice.

Of course, that leads to the obvious question of what is a milli-Palin?

On a separate topic, what is the unit of measurement of a mind-numbing pseudoscientific utterance? A “Monckton”? A “Ham”? A “Dembski”? Suggestions? Then of course, we must agree on common units of measurement (e.g.; is it 5 minutes of mind-numbing, or 10 minutes? Does the jaw have to drop?).

Reminds me of the time I had to explain to an architect and an owner that merely insulating an exterior chase would not prevent freezing: we would have to provide some heat. As I recall, I finally “got through’ when I suggested theycompare the chase, to putting something in a picnic cooler, and asked how long it would take for the internal temperature to match the outside temperature.
John Bunzick, CCS, CCCA, LEED AP
Senior Member
Username: bunzick

Post Number: 1287
Registered: 03-2002
Posted on Wednesday, December 15, 2010 - 04:23 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Milli-Palin: When you lip-sync your outsized ambitions?
Steven Bruneel, AIA, CSI-CDT, LEED-AP
Senior Member
Username: redseca2

Post Number: 260
Registered: 12-2006


Posted on Wednesday, December 15, 2010 - 06:33 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

The Norris Constant:

As the number of Ninja assassins trying to get Chuck Norris in a B movie increases, the probability that they will collide and cancel each other out increases exponentially, creating the familiar bell curve with Chuck at the top.
Lisa Goodwin Robbins, RA, CCS, LEED ap
Senior Member
Username: lgoodrob

Post Number: 112
Registered: 08-2004
Posted on Thursday, December 16, 2010 - 09:30 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

More please! I love this thread!
Ellis C. Whitby, AIA, PE, CSI, LEED® AP
Senior Member
Username: ecwhitby

Post Number: 83
Registered: 03-2003
Posted on Thursday, December 16, 2010 - 03:17 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

The Pikotuki (TP)
Measurement of Incompetence

Equal to 1/1000 of a nanotuki, or 0.0288 seconds of competent systems support. Also equal to one millionth of a mikrotuki, and used to describe work done by a grossly incompetent work force.

Finish (Nokia Research Center): pikotukihenkilö means "grossly incompetent person assigned in systems support".

The Mikrotuki (Finish: Literally micro-support): Derives from Finnish mikrotukihenkilö ("microcomputers systems support person"). It is one workday (8 h or 28,800 seconds) of one competent PC systems support person
Anne Whitacre, FCSI CCS
Senior Member
Username: awhitacre

Post Number: 1092
Registered: 07-2002


Posted on Friday, December 31, 2010 - 06:25 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

and finally,
Designer: a measurement describing someone with architectural ambitions who can not detail their way out of a paper bag. Of course... one would need to define the size of the paper bag, and how long they would be given to detail, but I think these issues can be worked out. This may be one of those amorphous measurements, much like the Barrel of Monkeys, above.
Anne Whitacre, FCSI CCS
Senior Member
Username: awhitacre

Post Number: 1093
Registered: 07-2002


Posted on Friday, December 31, 2010 - 06:29 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

oh... and
The Invoice Measurement of Time:
much like the Theory of Relativity, this is an inverse constant that is applied to services invoices sent out for payment. Factors include: invoice as a percentage of total monthly consultant billings X how irritating the client was to work with X how much you need the money = the inverse of how quickly you will be paid for that work.
Ellis C. Whitby, AIA, PE, CSI, LEED® AP
Senior Member
Username: ecwhitby

Post Number: 87
Registered: 03-2003
Posted on Monday, January 03, 2011 - 09:13 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Regarding the "Invoice Measurement of Time": are there different standards?

Such as:
1) how long it takes for the Owner to pay the prime;
2) how long it takes the prime to pay the consultants.

Also, does the Owners demand that chnages be implemented immediately versus thier willingness to pay for the change factor in?

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration