4specs.com    4specs.com Home Page

QuietRock soundproofing gypsum board Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

4specs Discussion Forum » Archive - Product Discussions #4 » QuietRock soundproofing gypsum board « Previous Next »

Author Message
David Axt, AIA, CCS, CSI
Senior Member
Username: david_axt

Post Number: 1032
Registered: 03-2002


Posted on Friday, February 13, 2009 - 12:54 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

What has been your experience with QuietRock soundproofing gypsum board products?
Jerome J. Lazar, RA, CCS, CSI, SCIP
Senior Member
Username: lazarcitec

Post Number: 644
Registered: 05-2003
Posted on Friday, February 13, 2009 - 03:11 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

excellent product, SOME GC'S CLAIM IT IS EXPENSIVE BUT FOR TOTAL ASSEMBLY COST IT IS NOT, WHEN IT HAS BEEN INSTALLED, I'VE HEARD OF NO PROBLEMS WITH THE INSTALLATION.
Here is a good article from W&C, that compares Quietrock to other soundboard products:
http://www.wconline.com/Articles/Article_Rotation/BNP_GUID_9-5-2006_A_10000000000000139418
Ron Beard CCS
Senior Member
Username: rm_beard_ccs

Post Number: 291
Registered: 10-2002


Posted on Friday, February 13, 2009 - 05:12 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

How does QuietRock compare to regular GWB on a resilient furring channel?
Jerome J. Lazar, RA, CCS, CSI, SCIP
Senior Member
Username: lazarcitec

Post Number: 645
Registered: 05-2003
Posted on Friday, February 13, 2009 - 05:21 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Ron, read the article in W&C, why would u use a resilient channel - kind of overkill isn't it...maybe ask the manufacturer directly.
Steven Hauk
Senior Member
Username: sh1net

Post Number: 22
Registered: 12-2004
Posted on Friday, March 13, 2009 - 10:25 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

With the UL U465 assembly and added SoundBreak and insulation, the National Gypsum literature says you have an STC rating of 57. Adding resilient channels and insulation to the U419 or u451 assembly the USG literature shows an STC rating of 54.
Anne Whitacre, FCSI CCS
Senior Member
Username: awhitacre

Post Number: 863
Registered: 07-2002


Posted on Sunday, March 15, 2009 - 08:48 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

remember, though, that a lot of sound travels through what is simply bad installation -- you still need to seal at top and bottom tracks; do not do electrical boxes back to back and guard against other penetrations that can transmit sound, including door frames. I had thought this product didn't come in a fire rated version, but apparently that information is outdated now..
John Bunzick, CCS, CCCA, LEED AP
Senior Member
Username: bunzick

Post Number: 1024
Registered: 03-2002
Posted on Monday, March 16, 2009 - 08:40 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

A curious thing about tests using resilient channels: none I've seen are newer than about thirty years old. Is the design of the resilient channel product used in those tests still even available? No one seems to know. Also, resilient channel is so easy to install wrong (misplaced screws keep it from being resilient) that it probably fails to work as planned much of the time. I try to avoid its use.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration