4specs.com    4specs.com Home Page

Pre-manufactured versus shop fabricat... Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

4specs Discussion Forum » Archive - Specifications Discussions #3 » Pre-manufactured versus shop fabricated flashing « Previous Next »

Author Message
Jerome J. Lazar, RA, CCS, CSI, SCIP
Senior Member
Username: lazarcitec

Post Number: 579
Registered: 05-2003
Posted on Tuesday, August 19, 2008 - 12:23 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

we typically specify pre-manufactured flashing on most projects, but we consistently get requests for shop-fabricated flashing, in some instances we allow it - curious what direction my fellow spec writers follow?
John Bunzick, CCS, CCCA, LEED AP
Senior Member
Username: bunzick

Post Number: 942
Registered: 03-2002
Posted on Tuesday, August 19, 2008 - 01:17 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Nearly all flashing I specify is shop-fabricated, whether by a sheet metal shop, curtain wall contractor, roofer etc. However, I actually simply specify the material and performance requirements without requiring it to be "shop fabricated" or otherwise. I'm not sure I see an advantage of pre-manufactured, and I don't care one way or the other if it's done right.
Anonymous
 
Posted on Tuesday, August 19, 2008 - 09:07 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

If/when wind uplift loads (IBC or FMG for copings and fascia/edges) are a factor, many pre-manufactured profiles have been tested, whereas shop-fab'd profiles would have generally required "per project" (i.e., relatively expensive) testing...although SMACNA has (only) recently developed wind uplift criteria for SOME "standard" SMACNA profiles.
John Bunzick, CCS, CCCA, LEED AP
Senior Member
Username: bunzick

Post Number: 943
Registered: 03-2002
Posted on Wednesday, August 20, 2008 - 09:47 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Aha, the roof edge. That was not what I was thinking of in my post, but yes I do specify those most of the time if the project architect understands the issue noted above. (We're still waiting, 8 years after saying we would do it, to adopt the IBC in Massachusetts. So in fact our code does not require the SE-1 roof edge test, though I prefer to use it anyway.)
Ralph Liebing, RA, CSI
Senior Member
Username: rliebing

Post Number: 883
Registered: 02-2003
Posted on Wednesday, August 20, 2008 - 10:30 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

We have transitioned over to "engineered [extruded] roof edge systems" in lieu of formed;

Systems [and details] that are tested and comply with ANSI/SPRI Standard ES-1, or FMG 1-90 for FMG INSURED BLDGS.
Marc C Chavez
Senior Member
Username: mchavez

Post Number: 322
Registered: 07-2002
Posted on Wednesday, August 20, 2008 - 11:02 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

NRCA has a set of details tested to meet requirements of IBC AND a large list of companies that make products that comply. So your not limited to the three large companies that are often mentioned.

See: http://www.nrca.net/rp/technical/details/itslisting.aspx.

Code officials our here are not enforcing it.
John Bunzick, CCS, CCCA, LEED AP
Senior Member
Username: bunzick

Post Number: 945
Registered: 03-2002
Posted on Thursday, August 21, 2008 - 08:58 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Until the roof blows off.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration