Author |
Message |
Jerome J. Lazar, RA, CCS, CSI, SCIP Senior Member Username: lazarcitec
Post Number: 579 Registered: 05-2003
| Posted on Tuesday, August 19, 2008 - 12:23 pm: | |
we typically specify pre-manufactured flashing on most projects, but we consistently get requests for shop-fabricated flashing, in some instances we allow it - curious what direction my fellow spec writers follow? |
John Bunzick, CCS, CCCA, LEED AP Senior Member Username: bunzick
Post Number: 942 Registered: 03-2002
| Posted on Tuesday, August 19, 2008 - 01:17 pm: | |
Nearly all flashing I specify is shop-fabricated, whether by a sheet metal shop, curtain wall contractor, roofer etc. However, I actually simply specify the material and performance requirements without requiring it to be "shop fabricated" or otherwise. I'm not sure I see an advantage of pre-manufactured, and I don't care one way or the other if it's done right. |
Anonymous
| Posted on Tuesday, August 19, 2008 - 09:07 pm: | |
If/when wind uplift loads (IBC or FMG for copings and fascia/edges) are a factor, many pre-manufactured profiles have been tested, whereas shop-fab'd profiles would have generally required "per project" (i.e., relatively expensive) testing...although SMACNA has (only) recently developed wind uplift criteria for SOME "standard" SMACNA profiles. |
John Bunzick, CCS, CCCA, LEED AP Senior Member Username: bunzick
Post Number: 943 Registered: 03-2002
| Posted on Wednesday, August 20, 2008 - 09:47 am: | |
Aha, the roof edge. That was not what I was thinking of in my post, but yes I do specify those most of the time if the project architect understands the issue noted above. (We're still waiting, 8 years after saying we would do it, to adopt the IBC in Massachusetts. So in fact our code does not require the SE-1 roof edge test, though I prefer to use it anyway.) |
Ralph Liebing, RA, CSI Senior Member Username: rliebing
Post Number: 883 Registered: 02-2003
| Posted on Wednesday, August 20, 2008 - 10:30 am: | |
We have transitioned over to "engineered [extruded] roof edge systems" in lieu of formed; Systems [and details] that are tested and comply with ANSI/SPRI Standard ES-1, or FMG 1-90 for FMG INSURED BLDGS. |
Marc C Chavez Senior Member Username: mchavez
Post Number: 322 Registered: 07-2002
| Posted on Wednesday, August 20, 2008 - 11:02 am: | |
NRCA has a set of details tested to meet requirements of IBC AND a large list of companies that make products that comply. So your not limited to the three large companies that are often mentioned. See: http://www.nrca.net/rp/technical/details/itslisting.aspx. Code officials our here are not enforcing it. |
John Bunzick, CCS, CCCA, LEED AP Senior Member Username: bunzick
Post Number: 945 Registered: 03-2002
| Posted on Thursday, August 21, 2008 - 08:58 am: | |
Until the roof blows off. |
|