4specs.com    4specs.com Home Page

Strange / Interesting Design Team Req... Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

4specs Discussion Forum » Archive - Specifications Discussions #3 » Strange / Interesting Design Team Requests « Previous Next »

Author Message
David R. Combs, CSI, CCS, CCCA
Senior Member
Username: davidcombs

Post Number: 272
Registered: 08-2004
Posted on Friday, April 11, 2008 - 12:15 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Those that don't fall under the category of "Favorite Typos" that is.

Received a request from a project architect the other day for a specification for a two-ply EPDM roofing system (and NO - it had nothing to do with a desire for redundancy).

Any others out there?
Ralph Liebing, RA, CSI
Senior Member
Username: rliebing

Post Number: 828
Registered: 02-2003
Posted on Friday, April 11, 2008 - 12:42 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Mechanical specs guy wanted me to revise our long-standing master for Field Painting and insert references to some of his Sections where he referenced my Section, which had none of the information he needed [and should have submitted as to work items, systems, materials, types, etc.], in it regarding the painting he was indicating.
Wayne Yancey
Senior Member
Username: wayne_yancey

Post Number: 37
Registered: 01-2008
Posted on Friday, April 11, 2008 - 12:49 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Ralph,

Say what?
George A. Everding, AIA, CSI, CCS, CCCA
Senior Member
Username: geverding

Post Number: 418
Registered: 11-2004
Posted on Friday, April 11, 2008 - 01:05 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

"I want you to list in the specs all of the locations where code requires safety glazing, so I don't have to figure it out and to show it on the drawings."
Anonymous
 
Posted on Tuesday, September 09, 2008 - 02:20 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

From an institution's "Standard" Division 1, yes not 01, but 1...and all of the Sections are numbered in MF 1988. HELP!!!!!

The Contractor has the option of using a standard "Rent-a-Fence" with a minimum height of 7 feet provided that the fence is reinforced as required to deter vandalism.

By a kid throwing rocks?
By a car being run into it?

The sound you hear is my head banging against my desk. This is only the tip of the iceberg.
Anonymous
 
Posted on Tuesday, September 09, 2008 - 02:21 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

EDUCATE, my friend-- EDUCATE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
John Bunzick, CCS, CCCA, LEED AP
Senior Member
Username: bunzick

Post Number: 956
Registered: 03-2002
Posted on Tuesday, September 09, 2008 - 06:18 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Well, if the owner is requiring its use, go ahead and use it. Advise them of a proposed alternative text, if you like, but it's their project and they ultimately bear the risk that comes with it. If I make a suggestion to the owner and she doesn't accept it, I don't loose any sleep over it.
Steven Bruneel, AIA, CSI-CDT, LEED-AP
Senior Member
Username: redseca2

Post Number: 137
Registered: 12-2006
Posted on Tuesday, September 09, 2008 - 06:44 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

It was more than a few years ago at a design oriented world class firm that I was told:

"Okay, you have explained that it is not to code and probably not buildable, but we want you to leave it in as a record of the design process".

Meaning the spec writer, project tech leader and the harried CA team would be left responsible for messing up the design principals brilliant design.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration