4specs.com    4specs.com Home Page

Concrete topping slab thickness Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

4specs Discussion Forum » Archive - Product Discussions #2 » Concrete topping slab thickness « Previous Next »

Author Message
Anne Whitacre, CCS CSI
Senior Member
Username: awhitacre

Post Number: 186
Registered: 07-2002
Posted on Monday, May 02, 2005 - 08:15 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

I've got designers who want to put in a 1" thick concrete topping slab in a high traffic area, and I can't find any "real" criteria that tells them not to do it. I have PLENTY of anecdotal and project experience that tells me that this is a bad idea, but we have the type of contractor where we need an "authority" to be able to reject anything. Can someone point me in the direction of topping slab design criteria? I've done a search and again, can't find a source that will help.

Thanks
Ronald L. Geren, RA, CSI, CCS, CCCA
Senior Member
Username: specman

Post Number: 130
Registered: 03-2003
Posted on Monday, May 02, 2005 - 08:21 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

What's the intended purpose for the topping? Aesthetics, durability, both?

In either case, I'd look at something with a high compressive strength (i.e. Ardex). Standard concrete as a topping isn't, in my opinion, the way to go.
Anonymous
 
Posted on Monday, May 02, 2005 - 11:55 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

As I remember it the ACI (American Concrete Institute) addresses this issue in its Manual of Practice.

Thin topping slabs tend to crack. In order to control the cracking you have to excercise special care with bonding and concrete mix.
George A. Everding, AIA, CCS, CSI
Senior Member
Username: geverding

Post Number: 31
Registered: 11-2004
Posted on Tuesday, May 03, 2005 - 01:08 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

The right way to do it is improve the strength of the concrete, and glue it down, to paraphrase the comments above. Contact the chemists/engineers/technical folks at one of the companies that figured out how to do it right (Euclid, Sika, DeGussa, or another name you trust) and have them provide the ammo you need to convince the contractor that 1” of topping, unmodified and unglued, is the wrong way to do it.
Anonymous
 
Posted on Tuesday, May 03, 2005 - 06:59 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

It's possible to use Raeco, Ardex, and the like to get a 1 inch thick "topping" slab and have no worries about cracking or debonding, in installed in accordance with manuf. instructions. Bigger aggregates are added to the self leveling mixes, as I understand it.
Di Ann Hassloch (Unregistered Guest)
Unregistered guest
Posted on Thursday, March 09, 2006 - 11:47 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

We have a parking garage with a damaged surface where the plan is to use 3/4" of Perma Crete as a decorative finish. Does anyone have any experience with this product, and do you think it will hold up in Biloxi, under traffic? It is listed as 6000 psi, and supposedly is used in numerous horizontal construction renovations. Thank you
Doug Brinley AIA CSI CDT CCS
Senior Member
Username: dbrinley

Post Number: 178
Registered: 12-2002
Posted on Thursday, March 09, 2006 - 01:17 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

I think you DO want to encourage this 'topping' approach but change your thinking. The key factors are hydration, bonding, flexibility - NOT compressive strength. A product with compressive strength similar to the substrate will usually perform better in a repair situation. Also, you want a polymer modified product to aid flexibility. Strengthing the bond characteristics is extremely important, so be sure to specify development of a 'profile' to meet the manufacturers recommendations - no more and no less. Select a bonding agent when recommended, and choose a complete system with a technical field person administering the repair. Don't rely solely on a product rep unless you know for certain he/she wasn't selling copiers last week.

The classification of useful products might be actually a mortar, not a 'topping'. This is because the product will have the consistency and working characteristics of mortar, not concrete. And if you think about it, a 'mortar' is quite workable and formable when you have an existing slab ready-made as a working surface.
Try 'Dura-crete' (L&M); or WR Meadows 'Seal-Tight Meadow-Patch T1'. Be careful to talk with the rep to make sure you get an architectural product as opposed to a civil/industrial product if that's what you're after.
Anonymous
 
Posted on Thursday, March 09, 2006 - 05:43 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

It seems that there must be some reason to use a higher compressive strength product since Ardex requires their 6000 psi product when exposed to traffic. I have specified this for pedestrian traffic surfaces for years, and not the lower 4000 psi product, at the recommendation of the manufacturer.
Doug Brinley AIA CSI CDT CCS
Senior Member
Username: dbrinley

Post Number: 180
Registered: 12-2002
Posted on Thursday, March 09, 2006 - 06:43 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

I think the distinction that was being made was Di Ann was addressing a parking garage substrate. Most garage slabs are quite flexible (under dynamic loading), in which case high compressive strength products tend to have reduced ductility and increased hardness. Those characteristics are somewhat at odds with the desirable 'thin-ness' and bonding characteristics for that garage application.
For what it's worth I am a fan of Ardex's products, although they do have a tendency to do things right (from my experience), hence they've been expensive on my projects, and their stuff works so don't hear me dissing their products that compete with the concept I parroted previously.
Doug Brinley AIA CSI CDT CCS
Senior Member
Username: dbrinley

Post Number: 181
Registered: 12-2002
Posted on Thursday, March 09, 2006 - 06:45 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

oops run-on sentence!

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration