Author |
Message |
Lynn Javoroski
Senior Member Username: lynn_javoroski
Post Number: 59 Registered: 07-2002
| Posted on Tuesday, February 10, 2004 - 11:31 am: | |
Has anyone heard of flexible curtain track? I don't mean where the manufacturer factory-bends the track to your configuration; I mean where you can bend it on-site to a free-form shape - really flexible! I have a nagging thought in the back of my mind that I have seen or heard of this somewhere, but I can't find it. |
Mark Handler New member Username: maniac
Post Number: 1 Registered: 02-2004
| Posted on Tuesday, February 10, 2004 - 01:09 pm: | |
http://boat-supply.realemall.com/Recmar/Flexible-Shower-Curtain-Track.asp |
(Unregistered Guest)
Unregistered guest
| Posted on Tuesday, February 10, 2004 - 02:15 pm: | |
The Kirsch Company has a flexible track for draperies. It can be hand bent to follow continuious curves for wall or ceiling mounted applications. It is available on special order from most local drapery / curtain retail stores. We offer it only to commercial accounts. Regards, Art Serio www.CubicleCurtainFactory.com |
Joseph Berchenko Member Username: josephberchenko
Post Number: 3 Registered: 08-2003
| Posted on Saturday, March 06, 2004 - 05:40 pm: | |
Lynn - Did you ever find any flexible cubicle curtain track? I'd be curious to find out, though I don't think it exists. Both responses you received are for standard curtains. |
Lynn Javoroski
Senior Member Username: lynn_javoroski
Post Number: 73 Registered: 07-2002
| Posted on Monday, March 08, 2004 - 12:14 pm: | |
Nope - never found it. It's so annoying when you think you've seen something somewhere and can't remember where exactly. And it's still this little nagging in the far reaches of what I call my mind... You're right, the responses above were for standard tracks. |
Anonymous
| Posted on Monday, March 08, 2004 - 12:33 pm: | |
My Dear: Their called 'senior moments.' This is just the beginning I'm afraid. <g> |
Anonymous
| Posted on Monday, March 08, 2004 - 01:37 pm: | |
OOPs! Had another one--- that should be "they're", as in they are!!! |