4specs.com    4specs.com Home Page

Generic name for Tectum? Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

4specs Discussion Forum » Archive - Product Discussions » Generic name for Tectum? « Previous Next »

Author Message
David Axt, AIA, CCS, CSI
Senior Member
Username: david_axt

Post Number: 301
Registered: 03-2002
Posted on Tuesday, July 20, 2004 - 08:08 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

What is the generic name for tectum? We have been using "Acoustical Cementitious Wood Fiber Panels" and the architects are complaining that it is too long.
John Bunzick, CCS, CCCA
Senior Member
Username: bunzick

Post Number: 241
Registered: 03-2002
Posted on Wednesday, July 21, 2004 - 09:23 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

There's no need to use a generic name because there's no one else that makes the product! At least, that was the case a few years ago when I was challenged in a public job for using a proprietary product. Does anyone know of an equal to this material?
Ralph Liebing
Senior Member
Username: rliebing

Post Number: 90
Registered: 02-2003
Posted on Wednesday, July 21, 2004 - 09:32 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Found a series of products called "Fibroplank" made by the Martin Corporation-
www.martinfireproofing.com

Shown as equivalent to Tectum, by name, in MasterSpec 03511
Dave Metzger
Senior Member
Username: davemetzger

Post Number: 82
Registered: 07-2001
Posted on Wednesday, July 21, 2004 - 10:33 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Even if the product is sole source, I don't think it's good practice to use proprietary names on drawings. I call tectum "wood fiber panels".

We too have specified Martin Acoustical Products as another manufacturer in addition to Tectum; their product was called AcoustiPlank.
David Axt, AIA, CCS, CSI
Senior Member
Username: david_axt

Post Number: 303
Registered: 03-2002
Posted on Wednesday, July 21, 2004 - 02:27 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

In what section do you specify Tectum?
Dave Metzger
Senior Member
Username: davemetzger

Post Number: 83
Registered: 07-2001
Posted on Wednesday, July 21, 2004 - 03:55 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Depends how I use them. If for acoustical purposes, I've used Section 09810. If just for suspended ceiling panels in a typical suspended ceiling grid, Section 09510.
Anonymous
 
Posted on Wednesday, July 21, 2004 - 05:22 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

I concur that it's bad practice to use a trade name on drawings. . . It's been years since I specified Tectum, but "cementitious wood fiber acoustical panel" sounds reasonable. I don't understand the complaint with respect to length. Don't your drawings have an abbreviation list and can't you go from there with "CWFAC"?
Lynn Javoroski
Senior Member
Username: lynn_javoroski

Post Number: 120
Registered: 07-2002
Posted on Wednesday, July 21, 2004 - 05:30 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Why not just call them "acoustical panels" on the drawings and let the specifications specify what they are? Is that a radical idea? We use abbreviations (AWP is an acoustical wall panel, for example, and if we have more than 1, it's AWP-1 or AWP-2) and the abbreviation is then used in the spec to identify what is meant by the specification - which can be a paragraph! No size restriction in the specs like there is on the drawings. Drawings have enough stuff on them and usually very little room for words. Isn't that one of the reasons why we have specifications?
Anonymous
 
Posted on Wednesday, July 21, 2004 - 05:40 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Yep. Come to think of it, I've done it Lynn's way too. And my the way, my "CWFAC" abbreviation above should have been "CWFAP."
Richard L Matteo
Senior Member
Username: rlmat

Post Number: 36
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Wednesday, July 21, 2004 - 06:54 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Thank you Lynn - Yours is the best idea I've heard on the subject. It would definately be my choice and I have done it this way for a number of products that otherwise defy description. If we ever took this long to decide on what to call something we'd never get anything done. Thanks again for "cutting to the chase".
John Regener, AIA, CCS, CCCA, CSI, SCIP
Senior Member
Username: john_regener

Post Number: 168
Registered: 04-2002
Posted on Wednesday, July 21, 2004 - 11:51 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

CWFAP = see wa fap?

It literally runs off the tongue!

Make sure to specify the type of Scotch tape to use to attach the Tectum panels to the Sheetrock.
Ronald J. Ray, RA, CCS, CCCA
Senior Member
Username: rjray

Post Number: 20
Registered: 04-2004
Posted on Friday, July 23, 2004 - 08:42 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

So, you followers of abbreviations, what would you call the material when used as a roof deck?

CWFARD?
Lynn Javoroski
Senior Member
Username: lynn_javoroski

Post Number: 121
Registered: 07-2002
Posted on Friday, July 23, 2004 - 09:36 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

In keeping with the simple approach, I'd probably use RD-n, where "n" is a number, and identify it in the spec as "cementitious wood fiber acoustical roof deck". That allows other roof decks on the project. Remember "K.I.S.S." If an abbreviation is as long as what you're abbreviating (and I've seen some like that), you've missed the idea of abbreviation.
Ronald J. Ray, RA, CCS, CCCA
Senior Member
Username: rjray

Post Number: 21
Registered: 04-2004
Posted on Friday, July 23, 2004 - 09:40 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

It appears my sarcasm was missed.

With word processing and computer aided drafting, abbreviations are not used in my office.
Lynn Javoroski
Senior Member
Username: lynn_javoroski

Post Number: 122
Registered: 07-2002
Posted on Friday, July 23, 2004 - 09:44 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

No, it wasn't - I just chose to ignore it.
Dave Metzger
Senior Member
Username: davemetzger

Post Number: 84
Registered: 07-2001
Posted on Friday, July 23, 2004 - 10:07 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

How about Cementitious Wood Acoustic Panels (CWAP)

It's Friday--we need a little levity here
Ronald J. Ray, RA, CCS, CCCA
Senior Member
Username: rjray

Post Number: 22
Registered: 04-2004
Posted on Friday, July 23, 2004 - 10:17 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

With apologies to David Sedaris,

Me Talk Better Sarcasm One Day
Lynn Javoroski
Senior Member
Username: lynn_javoroski

Post Number: 123
Registered: 07-2002
Posted on Friday, July 23, 2004 - 01:04 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Dave, too bad they aren't Cementitious Resin Acoustic Panels.
Richard L Matteo
Senior Member
Username: rlmat

Post Number: 39
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Monday, July 26, 2004 - 10:54 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

I like Lynn's description. If I had my way, I wouldn't use them because I think there are better products out there.
David Axt, AIA, CCS, CSI
Senior Member
Username: david_axt

Post Number: 305
Registered: 03-2002
Posted on Monday, July 26, 2004 - 12:40 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Where do you suppose "Tectum" will be located in Masterformat '04?
Ronald L. Geren, RA, CSI, CCS, CCCA
Senior Member
Username: specman

Post Number: 48
Registered: 03-2003
Posted on Monday, July 26, 2004 - 12:42 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

To answer David's question:

Section 09 84 13 - Fixed Sound-Absorptive Panels
Robert Matschulat AIA, CSI , CCS (Unregistered Guest)
Unregistered guest
Posted on Tuesday, September 14, 2004 - 11:24 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

How about 06 70 00 Structural Composites?
I was thinking particle board might go there too.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration