4specs.com    4specs.com Home Page

CSI's Green Format vs. HPD Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

4specs Discussion Forum » Sustainable Design Topics » CSI's Green Format vs. HPD « Previous Next »

Author Message
Michelle Roberts
New member
Username: mroberts251

Post Number: 1
Registered: 08-2016
Posted on Thursday, August 25, 2016 - 12:49 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

I need some history. Why is it that Green Format didn't get traction and designers are now going to Google's Quartz Project Data Base. What can I do to get Green Format and it's website going again!
Ronald L. Geren, FCSI, AIA, CCS, CCCA, SCIP
Senior Member
Username: specman

Post Number: 1420
Registered: 03-2003


Posted on Thursday, August 25, 2016 - 01:17 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Budgets:
- Google: $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
- CSI: $

Need I say more?
Ron Geren, FCSI, AIA, CCS, CCCA, SCIP
www.specsandcodes.com
Richard Gonser AIA CSI CCCA SCIP
Senior Member
Username: rich_gonser

Post Number: 130
Registered: 11-2008
Posted on Thursday, August 25, 2016 - 01:21 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Become an advertiser on that Google page.
Richard Gonser AIA CSI CCCA SCIP
Senior Member
Username: rich_gonser

Post Number: 131
Registered: 11-2008
Posted on Thursday, August 25, 2016 - 01:50 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

I forgot to add, have it sponsored by a variety of manufacturers on a rotating basis.
George A. Everding, FCSI, CCS, CCCA, AIA
Senior Member
Username: geverding

Post Number: 830
Registered: 11-2004


Posted on Thursday, August 25, 2016 - 02:52 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

There is a fundamental, existential issue here: does it make sense for CSI to have Green Format in the first place? Not to denigrate the effort that went into creating this product - I know and respect many of the authors who spent long volunteer hours making it happen - but are we involved in too many peripheral activities at the expense of our core function?

CSI is not expert in sustainability, nor in BIM, nor in any of a myriad of other things some of us would like to do. We are, however, recognized outside of our organization as the experts in specifications - it's our middle name, right? All these other things deserve our mention and our notice only to the extent they influence, or are influenced by, specifications. But I think we make a mistake when we try to assume a leadership role in complex areas, like sustainability, that are really outside of our core competency.
anon (Unregistered Guest)
Unregistered guest
Posted on Thursday, August 25, 2016 - 05:19 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

I think CSI was in the right place at the right time with this GreenFormat idea, but the project strayed from what the focus should have been - developing a universal FORMAT for sustainable product information - into a maze of confusion and complexity that removed any possibility it could have any practical value.
David J. Wyatt, CDT
Senior Member
Username: david_j_wyatt_cdt

Post Number: 153
Registered: 03-2011
Posted on Friday, August 26, 2016 - 09:27 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

George,

At the risk of turning this into an Institute discussion thread, I admire the clear, complete, concise, and correct statement you just made. Thank you!

If an organization remains true to its real identity, the organization will be successful. That is, if the definition of success is fulfilling a practical mission.

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Username: Posting Information:
This is a public posting area. Enter your username and password if you have an account. Otherwise, enter your full name as your username and leave the password blank. Your e-mail address is optional.
Password:
E-mail:
Options: Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration