4specs.com    4specs.com Home Page

Smoke control sealant /Specs for ETS ... Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

4specs Discussion Forum » Sustainable Design Topics » Smoke control sealant /Specs for ETS requirements « Previous Next »

Author Message
Robin E. Snyder
Senior Member
Username: robin

Post Number: 191
Registered: 08-2004
Posted on Wednesday, April 30, 2008 - 03:20 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Has anyone prepared specs that address the requirements for ETS in residential building? In this case, i am dealing w/ a hotel, concrete floor slabs, and trying to address how the partitions are sealed, and how that works w/ deflection tracks. I assume I need a smoke reated/fire rated sealant at the head of partitions - any suggestions on products?
Wayne Yancey
Senior Member
Username: wayne_yancey

Post Number: 42
Registered: 01-2008
Posted on Wednesday, April 30, 2008 - 05:27 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

I recommend you consult with an Acoustical Consultant.

To answer your first question (but I am clueless as to what ETS means). Yes. However, drawings may be more important than specifying products.

Are the head-fo-wall joints always exposed to view in the final assembly? If not, consider the FireStik from CEMCO in conjunction with a) Metal-Lite, Inc.; Slotted Track, or b) Sliptrack Systems; SLP-TRK.

At a recent project (30 story condo with concrete frame) 90% of the interior partition head-of-wall terminations at the underside of the slab are exposed to view. Something about the "Loft Look." The client wants joints without a large exposed sealant joint. The FireStik was nixed for visual reasons. I have some details that I can share that explain the details better than I can describe here. E-mail me at wayne.yancey@callison.com. The exposed surfaces of the concrete slab above were skim coated to provide a smooth white surface.

Wayne
Ronald L. Geren, AIA, CSI, CCS, CCCA, SCIP
Senior Member
Username: specman

Post Number: 645
Registered: 03-2003
Posted on Wednesday, April 30, 2008 - 05:34 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

I believe ETS = Environmental Tobacco Smoke.

You can use a UL assembly for fire-rated bottom of wall and top of wall conditions, which is required anyway for walls dividing sleeping units in a hotel.
Robin E. Snyder
Senior Member
Username: robin

Post Number: 192
Registered: 08-2004
Posted on Wednesday, April 30, 2008 - 05:36 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Ron:
Do you know if the UL assemblies address the ETS requirements of LEED?
Ronald L. Geren, AIA, CSI, CCS, CCCA, SCIP
Senior Member
Username: specman

Post Number: 646
Registered: 03-2003
Posted on Wednesday, April 30, 2008 - 06:01 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Specifically, no.

I'd look at bottom-of-wall joint assemblies starting with BW-S, with "S" indicating a static joint.

For head-of-wall, I'd look for joints starting with HW-D, with "D" indicating a dynamic joint if deflection is expected.

LEED doesn't give specific strategies for complying with this requirement, but if all joints are sealed, they should minimize ETS. You can require testing of the joints to verify performance by using test methods similar to those used for field testing air barriers.

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Username: Posting Information:
This is a public posting area. Enter your username and password if you have an account. Otherwise, enter your full name as your username and leave the password blank. Your e-mail address is optional.
Password:
E-mail:
Options: Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration