4specs.com    4specs.com Home Page

Luminous Egress Markings Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

4specs Discussion Forum » MasterFormat 2004 Discussions » Luminous Egress Markings « Previous Next »

Author Message
Jerome J. Lazar, RA, CCS, CSI, SCIP
Senior Member
Username: lazarcitec

Post Number: 950
Registered: 05-2003
Posted on Thursday, November 15, 2012 - 12:17 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Where would I specify this product?
Dave Metzger
Senior Member
Username: davemetzger

Post Number: 448
Registered: 07-2001
Posted on Thursday, November 15, 2012 - 03:51 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Currently 101443 Photoluminescent Signage.

However, the next update of MasterFormat will include a new section 104500 Photoluminescent Exit Specialties which is intended to include not only photoluminescent signage related to exit and egress, but also (applied) markings for egress edges, stair edges, door frames, door handles, etc.
Jeffrey Wilson CSI CCS
Senior Member
Username: wilsonconsulting

Post Number: 85
Registered: 03-2006
Posted on Thursday, November 15, 2012 - 08:56 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

I have used a section I made up: 104513 "Luminous Egress Path Markings" based on the language in the ICC.

I'm glad to hear that 104500 will be introduced into MasterFormat. This follows the same logic I used to introduce a new category following "Fire Protection Specialties" rather then categorizing these devices as "signage."
Christopher Borcsok
Senior Member
Username: ckb

Post Number: 12
Registered: 06-2013
Posted on Thursday, November 14, 2013 - 09:19 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Having seen this come up a few times recently with the new "Running Man" exit signs being adopted in Canada with the new version of the NBC and the provincial building codes based on it, I've grown more and more against the use of externally illuminated photoluminescent exit signs. The code requires the adjacent luminaire to be continuously illuminated, thereby defeating the purpose of energy savings purported by these signs. A 3 Watt internally illuminated exit sign that is running 24/7/365 is always going to consume less energy than the ambient lighting luminaire that must be connected both to emergency power, and not be connected to any automated control means (> 3 Watt pot light, F32T8, etc).

Anyone else with experience on these things?
Michael Heinsdorf, P.E.
Member
Username: michael_heinsdorf_pe

Post Number: 3
Registered: 01-2014
Posted on Tuesday, January 07, 2014 - 03:08 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

If you can wait, MasterSpec section 265219: Emergency and Exit Lighting is coming out March 2014.

In the meantime, Section 265100 - Interior Lighting (which was withdrawn 12/2013, but is probably still in your library) has interior egress exit signs, both of the illuminated and luminescent variety.
Jeffrey Wilson CSI CCS
Senior Member
Username: wilsonconsulting

Post Number: 119
Registered: 03-2006
Posted on Wednesday, January 08, 2014 - 09:57 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Michael: I presume Section 265219 will not address site-applied luminous egress path markings (such as for stair nosings, railings, exit pathways, etc.) which are req'd by the IBC in high-rise construction but are not "lighting" -- true? Do you know whether ARCOM plans to develop a Div 10 section for these systems?
Michael Heinsdorf, P.E.
Intermediate Member
Username: michael_heinsdorf_pe

Post Number: 4
Registered: 01-2014
Posted on Wednesday, January 08, 2014 - 02:08 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Jeffrey, those markings are not covered in 265219 and I don't think they are in an existing section. I'll check with one of the writers in the Architectural side to see if there are plans to cover that product type and post back here.
Michael Heinsdorf, P.E.
Senior Member
Username: michael_heinsdorf_pe

Post Number: 6
Registered: 01-2014
Posted on Friday, January 10, 2014 - 12:05 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Luminous Markings are on the wishlist. However, they aren't on the current production schedule, so don't look for them in the next 15 months.
Louis Medcalf, FCSI, CCS
Senior Member
Username: louis_medcalf

Post Number: 21
Registered: 11-2010
Posted on Monday, February 10, 2014 - 05:04 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

I think they belong with signs and specify them in 10 1445 Luminous Egress Path Markings. The IBC uses that phrase and puts them in Chapter 10 Means of Egress rather than in Chapter 7 or Chapter 9 that deal with fire protection. 'Markings' don't seem to me to be related to 'fire protection' in any way: they are signs and accessories that direct persons to exits in conditions of power failure, whether or not there is a fire.
Chris Grimm, CSI, CCS, SCIP
Senior Member
Username: chris_grimm_ccs_scip

Post Number: 542
Registered: 02-2014
Posted on Wednesday, February 02, 2022 - 04:05 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Has anyone had success with photoluminescent paint? A client wanted to use it for a school that has concrete columns in the middle of the corridor, but 3 products we found online were actually not available, and the 4th one came in 1 gallon buckets with a lofty price tag and the product was so thick it could not even be used. The owner's and architect's goal was to find the most abuse-resistant product for luminous marking of obstacles, since the elementary school corridor would be subject to kids abrading and picking at the material. I plan to call the usual luminous tape manufacturer(s) about their marking tape (usually 1", sometimes 2") that is used like a barber pole, to see if they think it is pick resistant. That's assuming we cannot actually find a paint product that works, or that it might not be more abrasion and pick resistant anyway.

For luminous paint we initially specified:
1. GloNation
2. Kosmic Kreations
3. Ready Set Glo

Of those 3, the contractor reported that one company is out of business, one is only self leveling so would not work for vertical surfaces, and one will not sell in US. Then they tried Allureglow USA, available through PPG Paints or directly, (888) 493-4569, www.allureglowusa.com -- this is the product that was so thick they said they could not use it. I don't know if they checked with the manufacturer for thinning instructions. The product data claims it is "easily applied". The architect just asked me not to spec it again but to find a better luminous paint. She also asked Sherwin-Williams, who had something but is not available (they only sell to aeronautic market or something?)

So I thought I might ask my fine friends here if you have had any GOOD experiences with luminous paint that you could suggest.

In an old archived thread, William mentions luminous paint without naming anyone. http://discus.4specs.com/discus/messages/7463/5421.html.

Since these threads are also about MasterFormat -- I see there is still a separate number and title for 101443 - Photoluminscent Signage. I had hoped it would be phased out when they added the new 104500. For now I am keeping them together in my specs and I call it 104600 - Luminous Egress Path Markings. It doesn't seem like we need separate specs for each way that the mfr and sub can comply with the requirements (signage, tapes, paints).
Lisa Goodwin Robbins, RA, CCS, LEED ap
Senior Member
Username: lgoodrob

Post Number: 401
Registered: 08-2004
Posted on Wednesday, February 02, 2022 - 06:08 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Chris,
We were just talking about photoluminescent products at yesterday's office meeting. We don't usually have requests for paints, because they mostly don't meet VOC requirements and have a reputation as terrible to work with.
We have specified AfterGlow LLC and Performance Indicator LLC (now called Bambu LLC) photoluminescent paints. Both require a color base coat, two color top coats, and one clear coat protective finish.
I don't know if anyone has actually used them on a project. Sorry I can't be more helpful.
-
Loretta Sheridan
Intermediate Member
Username: leshrdn

Post Number: 4
Registered: 11-2021
Posted on Wednesday, February 09, 2022 - 09:37 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Check out theatrical supply companies. Theatre uses a lot of photoluminescent paint. Wildfire is one brand. I don't know if they have photoluminescent paint or not, but they might.

These are for theatrical applications so they will likely have the issues Lisa Goodwin Robbins brought up since it is considered a temporary application.
Chris Grimm, CSI, CCS, SCIP
Senior Member
Username: chris_grimm_ccs_scip

Post Number: 544
Registered: 02-2014
Posted on Friday, February 11, 2022 - 04:32 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Thanks, that gives us a couple more to try.
Chris Grimm, CSI, CCS, SCIP
Senior Member
Username: chris_grimm_ccs_scip

Post Number: 545
Registered: 02-2014
Posted on Friday, February 11, 2022 - 04:35 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Web search for Wildfire photoluminescent paint indicates it is for use under a blacklight, so I skipped that one.

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Username: Posting Information:
This is a public posting area. Enter your username and password if you have an account. Otherwise, enter your full name as your username and leave the password blank. Your e-mail address is optional.
Password:
E-mail:
Options: Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration