4specs.com    4specs.com Home Page

Spacing of Section Numbers Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

4specs Discussion Forum » MasterFormat 2004 Discussions » Spacing of Section Numbers « Previous Next »

Author Message
John Bunzick, CCS, CCCA
Senior Member
Username: bunzick

Post Number: 514
Registered: 03-2002
Posted on Monday, May 01, 2006 - 05:10 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Well, it's been a couple years since the spacing of six digit Masterformat was discussed. ( http://discus.4specs.com/discus/messages/1097/1061.html) I'd be interested to know what folks have settled on for numbers within the text of a Section, and for file naming (discounting the 8-digit anomolies). We have to make this decision now. Possibilities are endless, but I'm guessing most are probably using one of these for text:

012345
01 2345
01 23 45

and for file names: 012345

What did you came up with?
William C. Pegues, FCSI, CCS
Senior Member
Username: wpegues

Post Number: 598
Registered: 10-2002
Posted on Monday, May 01, 2006 - 07:15 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

I use

xx xx xx

for both section names and file names.
Doug Brinley AIA CSI CDT CCS
Senior Member
Username: dbrinley

Post Number: 213
Registered: 12-2002
Posted on Monday, May 01, 2006 - 07:23 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Same as William.
David R. Combs, CSI, CCS, CCCA
Senior Member
Username: davidcombs

Post Number: 135
Registered: 08-2004
Posted on Monday, May 01, 2006 - 09:30 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Same here. No problems yet. I've tried the others, and the former just seems easier to read.
Sheldon Wolfe
Senior Member
Username: sheldon_wolfe

Post Number: 206
Registered: 01-2003
Posted on Monday, May 01, 2006 - 10:50 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

I'm sticking with the xx-xxxx format, for both section numbers and filenames.
Ralph Liebing, RA, CSI
Senior Member
Username: rliebing

Post Number: 367
Registered: 02-2003
Posted on Tuesday, May 02, 2006 - 07:18 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Use 012345 for Section and file names; verbally use 01-2345.

No problems; readily accepted by all in this A/E shop.
Shedrick E. Glass, CSI, CCS
Senior Member
Username: shedd_glass

Post Number: 22
Registered: 07-2004
Posted on Tuesday, May 02, 2006 - 08:02 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Using XX XXX for both section & file names.
Lynn Javoroski CSI CCS LEED AP SCIP Affiliate
Senior Member
Username: lynn_javoroski

Post Number: 351
Registered: 07-2002
Posted on Tuesday, May 02, 2006 - 09:06 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Same as Ralph...I've only heard one grumble from a mechanical engineer and that had to do with what he perceived as a multiplication of Sections like pipe insulation. Wanted to know why we changed everything. I explained and now it's OK. But nothing about the new numbers or their format, just about having to learn them anew (and that's from me)
Tracy Van Niel
Senior Member
Username: tracy_van_niel

Post Number: 175
Registered: 04-2002
Posted on Tuesday, May 02, 2006 - 09:50 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

We are using the same spacing as William. I include extensions in the file name (like bp2 or cd) to let me know when I've finished editing a section. Whenever I have a section that I've started editing and have a question on, then a "q" goes in the extension. That way I know at a glance which sections are completed and which ones have questions.
G. Wade Bevier, CSI, CCS, LEED-AP
Senior Member
Username: wbevier

Post Number: 8
Registered: 07-2004
Posted on Tuesday, May 02, 2006 - 10:00 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

We are using the (xx xx xx)three sets of paired digits as well.
We are trying to get our consultants to avoid the decimal and extension numbers to accomodate the in-house CA and submittal worksheets that will be used during construction. This latter issue seems to be harder to accomplish but I think we are making some headway.
Jim Brittell
Senior Member
Username: jwbrittell

Post Number: 21
Registered: 08-2004
Posted on Tuesday, May 02, 2006 - 01:17 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

We're using XX XXXX for section names and XXXXXX for file names.
William C. Pegues, FCSI, CCS
Senior Member
Username: wpegues

Post Number: 599
Registered: 10-2002
Posted on Tuesday, May 02, 2006 - 02:00 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Interesting.

I had one of our MEP consultants use

xxxxxx

And those are hard to read. Especially when you are looking for a section that is perhaps 222000 or something hard to see and numbers nearby ar visually similar. Also, some of them use long lists of 'related sections' and seeing those line up under each other is rough to see.

file names are one thing, but in the text when you are going for visual display, the unspaced/unbroken string of numbers is rough.

(At least the MEP did do MF2004 - actually, I have had quite good luck with them. I had only one local group balk at this saying they were still looking at legal implications through the middle of this summer and appealed directly to our principals who let them by. But then their came over anyway in 04, so much for legal implications -grin!)
Lynn Javoroski CSI CCS LEED AP SCIP Affiliate
Senior Member
Username: lynn_javoroski

Post Number: 352
Registered: 07-2002
Posted on Tuesday, May 02, 2006 - 02:23 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

"legal implications", huh...that reminds me of the doctor who, when told his patients where going to an all-natural diet, stated "you don't know what the medical implications of such a diet are..."
Marc C Chavez
Senior Member
Username: mchavez

Post Number: 152
Registered: 07-2002
Posted on Wednesday, May 03, 2006 - 11:01 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

xx xx xx or if forced xx xxxx

Deep Down inside, I always want to space the groups between the salad and dinner fork on the left side of the plate: division (level 1), salad fork, level 2, dinner fork, level 3 and Level four.

There has been a move afoot to move level four to the right side near the soup spoon or horizontally over the plate and parallel to the dessert fork and spoon with the bowl of the spoon pointing to the left, the tines of the fork pointing right and level 4 equidistant between the two.
Ron Beard CCS
Senior Member
Username: rm_beard_ccs

Post Number: 128
Registered: 10-2002
Posted on Wednesday, May 03, 2006 - 11:15 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Marc:
So where do you put the chop sticks? <g>
Ron
Marc C Chavez
Senior Member
Username: mchavez

Post Number: 153
Registered: 07-2002
Posted on Wednesday, May 03, 2006 - 11:22 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Although not an expert (I play one on TV) I would suspect that chopsticks should be placed front of you above the plate, parallel to the edge of the table, with the narrow ends on the hashi oki. The hashi oki is the the little platform you rest the tips of the chopsticks on. Hashi Oki to the left I assume for all of you right handers
Greta Eckhardt, AIA, CCS, CSI
New member
Username: greta_eckhardt

Post Number: 1
Registered: 07-2006
Posted on Friday, July 28, 2006 - 04:16 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

I am now in the process of converting office master sections to MasterFormat 2004 and have two comments:

1. By using the three pairs of digits with spaces between, we will have numbers that are easy to say (such as O-nine, twenty-one, sixteen for 09 21 16). I think this way of labeling them on the documents themselves will help communication.

2. While I think MF04 is quite good in many respects, I am not willing to use eight digits for any section. I am afraid this means disobeying dogma when I decide to call a certain document "Section 09 21 17 - Gypsum Board Shaft-Wall Assemblies". I am concerned that we need a consistent number of digits for the future when specifications become part of a data base, and 8 digits would be wasting cyberspace.
Phil Kabza
Senior Member
Username: phil_kabza

Post Number: 191
Registered: 12-2002
Posted on Friday, July 28, 2006 - 09:26 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Friday MasterFormat Haiku

The hand with five digits
Built the ancient garden wall
Specified with eight.
Wayne Yancey
Senior Member
Username: wyancey

Post Number: 152
Registered: 05-2005
Posted on Monday, July 31, 2006 - 11:13 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Marc stayed at a Holiday Inn Express at some point in time.
Dale Hurttgam, NCARB, AIA,LEED AP, CSI
Senior Member
Username: dwhurttgam

Post Number: 41
Registered: 10-2005
Posted on Monday, March 16, 2009 - 04:17 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

It has been over 2 1/2 years since this topic has been addressed within this "thread". With the "slow times" right now, we are making our move to MF04 - full service firm. I have seen quite a variation in the approaches to Section Number spacing through various thread discussions. My personal preferance is for XX XXXX. I feel that this gives emphasis to the Division Number which I feel should make it easier to process the overall location of the Section in the context of the project. For those of you who have been actively using MF04 do you see any movement to a consensus on how the Section Numbers are spaced. What is working for you?
Doug Brinley AIA CSI CDT CCS LEED AP
Senior Member
Username: dbrinley

Post Number: 226
Registered: 12-2002
Posted on Monday, March 16, 2009 - 04:22 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

XX XXXX works best for our public projects.
Jerry Tims
Senior Member
Username: jtims

Post Number: 59
Registered: 04-2005
Posted on Monday, March 16, 2009 - 04:23 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

XX XXXX here, with an occassional XX XXXX.XX thrown in for effect. :-)
David R. Combs, CSI, CCS, CCCA
Senior Member
Username: davidcombs

Post Number: 301
Registered: 08-2004
Posted on Monday, March 16, 2009 - 04:28 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

XX XX XX for all of our projects.

But we do use XX XX XX.XX for file naming only, for variations on the narrowscope sections. (We drop the ".XX" in the hard copy printing)
Wayne Yancey
Senior Member
Username: wayne_yancey

Post Number: 169
Registered: 01-2008
Posted on Monday, March 16, 2009 - 04:28 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

XXXXXX here exclusively (99%). We do not use .XX. There is enough flexibility in MFO4 to avoid this format, however I have used it sparingly to append forms to the end of a section (RFI Form or Substituion Request Form).

Only one client uses XX XX XX. Use nonbreaking space between pairs of numbers.
Sheldon Wolfe
Senior Member
Username: sheldon_wolfe

Post Number: 333
Registered: 01-2003


Posted on Monday, March 16, 2009 - 04:33 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Still using xx-xxxx. I know it's really cool and European to have a lot of blank spaces, but I'd rather know which numbers are connected.

But I have started writing phone numbers like this:
123 456 7890
Bob Woodburn, RA CSI CCS CCCA LEED AP
Senior Member
Username: bwoodburn

Post Number: 280
Registered: 01-2005
Posted on Monday, March 16, 2009 - 04:36 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

The bulk of the work in this office is for two major clients, both of which have promulgated their own master guide specs in MF 2004; both use XX XX XX. (One is the DoD's UFGS system, which numbers some sections in a 10-digit format (XX XX XX.XX XX). And sometimes on these government jobs, Division 01 is in MF 95 while the others are in MF 2004, or vice-versa. The government may furnish the front end in MF2004, our design-build partner asks for the rest in MF95 due to demand from its subs, so we end up with a mix of 5-, 6- and 10-digit numbers.

Personally I think XX XXXX would make most sense, but usually I don't make the decision.
John Bunzick, CCS, CCCA, LEED AP
Senior Member
Username: bunzick

Post Number: 1025
Registered: 03-2002
Posted on Tuesday, March 17, 2009 - 08:33 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Still using 12 34 56 in titles, but 123456 in file names.
(Unregistered Guest)
Unregistered guest
Posted on Tuesday, March 17, 2009 - 04:00 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

x x x x x x
John Regener, AIA, CCS, CCCA, CSI, SCIP
Senior Member
Username: john_regener

Post Number: 431
Registered: 04-2002


Posted on Wednesday, March 18, 2009 - 01:18 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Should the spaces in XX XX XX or XX XXXX be ordinary spaces or should they be "hard" spaces to prevent the Section number from breaking at the end of a line?

If a hyphen is used instead of a space, such as XX-XXXX, what sort of hyphen should it be? Again, the concern is the breaking of the Section number at the end of a line. This is probably a matter of the what the word processing program does when the hyphen character is typed.
Sheldon Wolfe
Senior Member
Username: sheldon_wolfe

Post Number: 334
Registered: 01-2003


Posted on Wednesday, March 18, 2009 - 01:25 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

A non-breaking space or a non-breaking hyphen should be used to keep the number on a single line.
Wayne Yancey
Senior Member
Username: wayne_yancey

Post Number: 170
Registered: 01-2008
Posted on Wednesday, March 18, 2009 - 01:25 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Should be nonbreaking space.
Use SHIFT+CONTROL+SPACE BAR to insert a nonbreaking space.

Nonbreaking space character will show when SHOW/HIDE is on and dissappear when SHOW/HIDE is off but all y'all you know this already.
Don Harris CSI, CCS, CCCA, AIA
Senior Member
Username: don_harris

Post Number: 219
Registered: 03-2003
Posted on Wednesday, March 18, 2009 - 02:09 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

XX XX XX in Sections
XXXXXX for file names
Ronald L. Geren, AIA, CSI, CCS, CCCA, SCIP
Senior Member
Username: specman

Post Number: 747
Registered: 03-2003


Posted on Wednesday, March 18, 2009 - 04:43 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

XX XX XX (and sometimes XX XX XX.XX) in Sections
XXXXX (and sometimes XXXXXX_XX) in filenames

For nonbreaking hyphens in MS Word, you use the CTRL+SHIFT+DASH keys.
Ronald L. Geren, AIA, CSI, CCS, CCCA, SCIP
RLGA Technical Services
www.specsandcodes.com
Christopher E. Grimm, CSI, CCS, LEEDŽ-AP, MAI, RLA
Senior Member
Username: tsugaguy

Post Number: 186
Registered: 06-2005


Posted on Wednesday, March 18, 2009 - 04:55 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

ditto of Wayne and guest: XXXXXX, and no .XX

at first it was due to peer pressure, and we tried other ways too in this office because 6 digits all strung together looked long and weird - but surprisingly, not much later, the old XXXXX numbers started to look strangely short when we would encounter them.

it is nice to do it one way and do it consistently, especially if you use any sort of database or other reference to section numbers. We have never had any snags with XXXXXX, and we have with the other methods at times.
Christopher E. Grimm, CSI, CCS, LEEDŽ-AP, MAI, RLA
Senior Member
Username: tsugaguy

Post Number: 187
Registered: 06-2005


Posted on Wednesday, March 18, 2009 - 05:00 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Does it bother anyone else that Masterspec level 5 sections do not sort properly because they leave out the decimal? e.g. prep for re-roofing, and several others - they appear at the END of a file folder window.
John Bunzick, CCS, CCCA, LEED AP
Senior Member
Username: bunzick

Post Number: 1026
Registered: 03-2002
Posted on Wednesday, March 18, 2009 - 05:47 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Yes, it does bother me. I've suggested they review/consider a method that would cause them to sort in proper order, but I'm not sure what the impediments to doing that are. Spaces work.
Christopher E. Grimm, CSI, CCS, LEEDŽ-AP, MAI, RLA
Senior Member
Username: tsugaguy

Post Number: 188
Registered: 06-2005


Posted on Wednesday, March 18, 2009 - 06:28 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

I've mentioned it to them too, but I guess they might be backlogged a little.
Specification Writer
Junior Member
Username: specification_writer

Post Number: 2
Registered: 01-2009
Posted on Thursday, March 19, 2009 - 10:22 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

XX XXXX for section numbers (w/hard space)
XX_XXXX for filing sections

Definitely no 8 digit section numbers.

Ctrl+space bar inserts a hard space in Wordperfect.
Specification Writer
Architect
Washington, D.C.
Phil Kabza
Senior Member
Username: phil_kabza

Post Number: 375
Registered: 12-2002


Posted on Friday, March 20, 2009 - 08:00 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

All right. It's time for y'all to order the T-shirt:

[link removed]
Christopher E. Grimm, CSI, CCS, LEEDŽ-AP, MAI, RLA
Senior Member
Username: tsugaguy

Post Number: 189
Registered: 06-2005


Posted on Friday, March 20, 2009 - 08:39 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Would make a great gift, but certainly not for me (right? ...right...?)

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Username: Posting Information:
This is a public posting area. Enter your username and password if you have an account. Otherwise, enter your full name as your username and leave the password blank. Your e-mail address is optional.
Password:
E-mail:
Options: Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration