4specs.com    4specs.com Home Page

GCCM and liability insurance Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

4specs Discussion Forum » Archive Coffee Pot and Water Cooler #2 » GCCM and liability insurance « Previous Next »

Author Message
David G. Axt, CCS, CSI ,SCIP
Senior Member
Username: david_axt

Post Number: 1653
Registered: 03-2002


Posted on Wednesday, April 25, 2018 - 02:33 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

I am having a hard time renewing my professional liability insurance because I work on many school projects that use the General Contractor Construction Manager delivery method. One insurance company will not insure me at all and the other insurance company will triple my premiums. My broker is looking into other insurance companies.

Is anyone else who works on GCCM projects experiencing this problem?

BTW, GCCM is also known as Construction Manager At Risk (CMAR).
David G. Axt, CCS, CSI, SCIP
Specifications Consultant
Axt Consulting LLC
J. Peter Jordan
Senior Member
Username: jpjordan

Post Number: 1034
Registered: 05-2004
Posted on Wednesday, April 25, 2018 - 03:06 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Don't know what additional risk there would be. From my perspective, developing specs for a traditional project is no different from a CMAR project.
J. Peter Jordan, FCSI, AIA, CCS, LEED AP, SCIP
Jeffrey Wilson CSI CCS SCIP
Senior Member
Username: wilsonconsulting

Post Number: 251
Registered: 03-2006


Posted on Wednesday, April 25, 2018 - 03:28 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

The renewal application from my insurance company gathers a lot of information about the project types I'm involved with, but I don't recall ever seeing a question about the construction delivery method. It's hard to imagine why it matters, but your company evidently views GCCM / CMAR as an increased risk. I'd be curious to know why. Presumably, there is a higher incidence of claims, perhaps directed at design professionals in particular.
Jeffrey Wilson CCS CSI SCIP
Wilson Consulting Inc
Ardmore PA
David G. Axt, CCS, CSI ,SCIP
Senior Member
Username: david_axt

Post Number: 1654
Registered: 03-2002


Posted on Wednesday, April 25, 2018 - 05:17 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

I too am puzzled why GCCM (CMAR) projects would be more of a liability to the design professional. I guess the insurance companies ran the numbers and determined there is more litigation with those projects.

So now I am faced with a difficult decision of either significantly raising my rates for GCCM projects or just not taking on any future projects that are GCCM.
David G. Axt, CCS, CSI, SCIP
Specifications Consultant
Axt Consulting LLC
Jeffrey Wilson CSI CCS SCIP
Senior Member
Username: wilsonconsulting

Post Number: 252
Registered: 03-2006


Posted on Wednesday, April 25, 2018 - 05:37 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Is the increase significant enough to warrant a substantial rate adjustment or consider eliminating a sector of business? The cost for professional liability should run in the range of 1% to 1.5% of billings. I have long considered that a reasonable cost, even though it is out of balance with the actual risk involved in spec consulting.
Jeffrey Wilson CCS CSI SCIP
Wilson Consulting Inc
Ardmore PA
David G. Axt, CCS, CSI ,SCIP
Senior Member
Username: david_axt

Post Number: 1655
Registered: 03-2002


Posted on Wednesday, April 25, 2018 - 06:26 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Jeffrey,

My new insurance premiums will triple which will bring my insurance premiums up to over 5 percent of my billings.
David G. Axt, CCS, CSI, SCIP
Specifications Consultant
Axt Consulting LLC
Guest (Unregistered Guest)
Unregistered guest
Posted on Thursday, April 26, 2018 - 10:27 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

David - This made me look at my recent renewal application (with Travelers); there are no questions about project delivery methods. FYI - Only standout narrow-focused question is portion of condo/coop projects.
Phil Kabza
Senior Member
Username: phil_kabza

Post Number: 607
Registered: 12-2002


Posted on Thursday, April 26, 2018 - 05:16 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Have you included recommended indemnification and limit of liability provisions in your contracts with AEs? If so, it's hard to understand why the concern on the part of your provider. Hopefully your agent is properly shopping your policy rather than just sending in a renewal invoice.
Mark Gilligan SE,
Senior Member
Username: mark_gilligan

Post Number: 856
Registered: 10-2007
Posted on Friday, April 27, 2018 - 01:25 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

This may be influenced by the reality that on Design Build projects the Contractor is likely to sue the consultants when the cost of the work they designed was greater than what was estimated when the contract was signed.
David G. Axt, CCS, CSI ,SCIP
Senior Member
Username: david_axt

Post Number: 1658
Registered: 03-2002


Posted on Friday, April 27, 2018 - 03:19 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Mark,

My insurance renewal form also asked the percentage of Design Build projects that I do, which is none.
David G. Axt, CCS, CSI, SCIP
Specifications Consultant
Axt Consulting LLC
David G. Axt, CCS, CSI ,SCIP
Senior Member
Username: david_axt

Post Number: 1660
Registered: 03-2002


Posted on Tuesday, May 08, 2018 - 06:09 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

As it turns out the question, on my insurance renewal form, of doing Construction Management at Risk was aimed at general contractors NOT consultants. The insurance company assumed by the way I answered the poorly worded question that I was acting as general contractor on 30 percent of my projects. Thus the reason for the higher insurance rates.

After I explained my situation to the insurance agent she resubmitted my form to the insurance company and my rates lowered.

This is another example of why clearly worded contracts/forms are so important.
David G. Axt, CCS, CSI, SCIP
Specifications Consultant
Axt Consulting LLC
Chris Grimm, CSI, CCS, SCIP, LEED AP BD+C
Senior Member
Username: chris_grimm_ccs_scip

Post Number: 399
Registered: 02-2014


Posted on Thursday, May 10, 2018 - 11:51 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Wow, so they were inadvertently proposing to insure you as a general contractor, and a CM at risk even, rather than a spec writer.
David G. Axt, CCS, CSI ,SCIP
Senior Member
Username: david_axt

Post Number: 1661
Registered: 03-2002


Posted on Thursday, May 10, 2018 - 12:02 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Here is the exact question.

6. What percentage of your firm's gross receipts services.

____% a. Feasibility, programming, planning, or economic studies.

____% b. At-Risk Construction Management

____% c. Fast Track/Design Build as Prime
David G. Axt, CCS, CSI, SCIP
Specifications Consultant
Axt Consulting LLC
Guest (Unregistered Guest)
Unregistered guest
Posted on Thursday, May 10, 2018 - 02:40 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

David - Strictly as a spec writer (only), I would have indicated zero for all three categories...I directly do not provide any of those types of services, although I have worked on some projects that were of those type delivery methods. I think you read more into the question than should have?

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration