4specs.com    4specs.com Home Page

Current peeves Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

4specs Discussion Forum » Archive Coffee Pot and Water Cooler #2 » Current peeves « Previous Next »

Author Message
Ellis C. Whitby, PE, CSI, AIA, LEED
Senior Member
Username: ecwhitby

Post Number: 279
Registered: 03-2003
Posted on Wednesday, January 11, 2017 - 04:50 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

I guess I am especially cranky today, hence this post.

Current peeves

• Email with no content in the subject line;
• Emails with no project identified on the subject line, but have a topic listed;
• Emails with the project identified on the subject line, but no topic listed;
• People who forward emails and change the subject discussed in the body of their text, but don’t identify the new topic in the subject line;
• Coworkers who categorize all RFI responses as clarifications;
• Contractors and Owners who designate every RFI response as a change;
• Contractors try to get a submittal processed as an RFI;
• Owners who change the project scope late in production (or during construction) but don’t provide more time to do the work;
• Contractors who cannot submit a construction schedule (including submittals);
• Contractors who ignore their submittal schedules;
• Coworkers who try to make changes to the CDs solely through submittal reviews or RFI responses;
• People who keep asking the same question. Again, and again, apparently because they want a different answer (or they have the memory of a colander);
• People who get upset if you send them a record of the phone conversation or meeting (“Don’t say that I told you that I agreed to do that!”);
• Coworkers who “shop” for samples for new projects in the CCA submittal files of active projects. No sooner than a sample disappears then we need it for the review of a submittal;
• Owners who will not “sign-off” and approve progress sets. As far as I am concerned, unless the Owner approves in writing the progress set then work has to stop (second pet peeve: PMs who want us to keep working in such circumstances: “We’ll work it out.”);
• People who ask if you are busy, and when you say yes, emphatically, still keep talking;

I guess I should stop before I depress myself.
Sheldon Wolfe
Senior Member
Username: sheldon_wolfe

Post Number: 945
Registered: 01-2003


Posted on Wednesday, January 11, 2017 - 04:55 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

The life of a specifier.
ken hercenberg
Senior Member
Username: khercenberg

Post Number: 1027
Registered: 12-2006


Posted on Wednesday, January 11, 2017 - 05:18 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Short list today?
Ellis C. Whitby, PE, CSI, AIA, LEED
Senior Member
Username: ecwhitby

Post Number: 280
Registered: 03-2003
Posted on Wednesday, January 11, 2017 - 05:35 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Ken: I started today in a pretty good mood. I am hoping going to the gym will help workout my attitude before I get home. No reason to take an attitude home.
David J. Wyatt, CDT
Senior Member
Username: david_j_wyatt_cdt

Post Number: 160
Registered: 03-2011
Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2017 - 08:23 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Keeping in mind, of course, that if we solve all the problems we might not have jobs!
Dave Metzger
Senior Member
Username: davemetzger

Post Number: 675
Registered: 07-2001
Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2017 - 09:26 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Or conversely, if we're retired we don't have those problems :P
Sheldon Wolfe
Senior Member
Username: sheldon_wolfe

Post Number: 946
Registered: 01-2003


Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2017 - 11:04 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

I don't think we need to worry, David.
J. Peter Jordan
Senior Member
Username: jpjordan

Post Number: 927
Registered: 05-2004
Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2017 - 11:55 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Since I am an independent specifier, some of this does not apply to me, but most of it does. I am particularly intrigued by the idea of people taking the submittal samples for use on other projects.
J. Peter Jordan, FCSI, AIA, CCS, LEED AP, SCIP
ken hercenberg
Senior Member
Username: khercenberg

Post Number: 1028
Registered: 12-2006


Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2017 - 05:32 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Peter, sample stealing is a very fun pastime. When I was still doing CA I insisted on a 4-drawer file cabinet for each project just to lock up samples.
Ellis C. Whitby, PE, CSI, AIA, LEED
Senior Member
Username: ecwhitby

Post Number: 282
Registered: 03-2003
Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2017 - 06:06 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Ken: "fun" for who?
Steven Bruneel, AIA, CSI-CDT, LEED-AP, EDAC
Senior Member
Username: redseca2

Post Number: 568
Registered: 12-2006


Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2017 - 06:28 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Sometimes I will notice a designer who is using the same sample for several unrelated projects. Glued one day to the sample board for a new building lobby and then next day out comes the exacto knife to cut it off and glue to the sample board for a law firm conference room.
David R. Combs, Assoc. AIA, CSI, CCCA, LEED AP
Advanced Member
Username: davidc

Post Number: 5
Registered: 02-2015
Posted on Saturday, January 14, 2017 - 08:55 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

One of my biggest:
Staff who - after having been given a TOC to mark up, and being reminded of the POLICY that the spec writer needs it and the basis-of-design product selections back three weeks prior to the spec deadline - promptly proceed to disregard that requirement (and give the spec writer NOTHING), and then ask two days before the deadline if their spec is finished yet. Darn right the answer is 'no'.
David R. Combs, Assoc. AIA, CSI, CCCA, LEED AP
Associate Principal
Regional Director of Operations
Guest (Unregistered Guest)
Unregistered guest
Posted on Monday, January 16, 2017 - 08:00 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

David...and then you're "labeled" as not a "team-player" especially when it comes time for annual performance reviews! Been there, done that, and suffered as much too.
ken hercenberg
Senior Member
Username: khercenberg

Post Number: 1031
Registered: 12-2006


Posted on Tuesday, January 17, 2017 - 09:55 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Sorry Ellis, I was being sarcastic again. I know it's unlike me :-)

David, I now make a point of copying my higher-ups on my follow-up emails where I remind everyone on the team that deadlines are X number of days or weeks away and that I have not yet received sufficient information to start working on their project. I then officially remove myself from the project and start work on my next deadline. Excellent fun, especially when I have a team I like working with. My bosses back me every time (but still sometimes ask me to find a way to get the errant projects out). Thankfully we do have other Specifiers on staff that can usually help pick up the projects that have been unresponsive. One of the benefits of working for a large firm that has professionals on staff as well as those who haven't quite figured out why they're here.
John Bunzick, CCS, CCCA, LEED AP
Senior Member
Username: bunzick

Post Number: 1701
Registered: 03-2002
Posted on Tuesday, February 07, 2017 - 02:39 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

One of my oldie favorite was when coworkers would not have made a decision during design, and comment "we'll pick it up in submittals." Sure fire way, of course, to not get what you want and have no way to get what you do.
Steven Bruneel, AIA, CSI-CDT, LEED-AP, EDAC
Senior Member
Username: redseca2

Post Number: 576
Registered: 12-2006


Posted on Tuesday, February 07, 2017 - 03:05 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

A constant peeve is finding who on a project team is designing a building versus who is designing a platonic ideal design for a building, the later demonstrated by the following quote from the Principal of a firm I worked for:
"Okay, I understand that the way it is now drawn does not meet code. But I want to submit it this way as a record of our design intent".
David R. Combs, Assoc. AIA, CSI, CCCA, LEED AP
Senior Member
Username: davidc

Post Number: 7
Registered: 02-2015
Posted on Tuesday, February 07, 2017 - 08:04 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

So your intent is for your design to NOT meet code then, right?
And you wish to memorialize it (this colossal failure to meet the standard of care) as such to the client, right?
No problem; go for it, Big Guy.
.
.
Ken-
I am fortunate to have moved beyond being the spec writer that sends those emails, to become the higher-up that gets copied on those very emails. And it goes without saying that I indeed have the spec writer's back. We reiterate the protocol occasionally, but a small few still think its a mere lofty goal to shoot for, rather than a common courtesy borne of necessity due to having so many projects to tend to.
David R. Combs, Assoc. AIA, CSI, CCCA, LEED AP
Associate Principal
Regional Director of Operations
Sheldon Wolfe
Senior Member
Username: sheldon_wolfe

Post Number: 952
Registered: 01-2003


Posted on Tuesday, February 07, 2017 - 10:39 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Steven, you should send that to Architexts.
George A. Everding, FCSI, CCS, CCCA, AIA
Senior Member
Username: geverding

Post Number: 846
Registered: 11-2004


Posted on Wednesday, February 08, 2017 - 09:06 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

"Codes are for sissies." My typical response whenever a young architect asked me if I had seen the Code Book.
David G. Axt, CCS, CSI ,SCIP
Senior Member
Username: david_axt

Post Number: 1545
Registered: 03-2002


Posted on Thursday, February 09, 2017 - 12:58 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post


David G. Axt, CCS, CSI, SCIP
Specifications Consultant
Axt Consulting LLC
Steven Bruneel, AIA, CSI-CDT, LEED-AP, EDAC
Senior Member
Username: redseca2

Post Number: 579
Registered: 12-2006


Posted on Thursday, February 09, 2017 - 02:05 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

There is the code, but there is also the Alternative Code.
J. Peter Jordan
Senior Member
Username: jpjordan

Post Number: 937
Registered: 05-2004
Posted on Thursday, February 09, 2017 - 03:53 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

And the Contract Documents are really vague suggestions rather than contract requirements.
J. Peter Jordan, FCSI, AIA, CCS, LEED AP, SCIP
Ellis C. Whitby, PE, CSI, AIA, LEED
Senior Member
Username: ecwhitby

Post Number: 286
Registered: 03-2003
Posted on Thursday, February 09, 2017 - 04:03 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

I don’t know which is more frustrating:

Contractors who say “that is not what we bid” even if the CDs were very clear on what was required, or
Designers who say “we’ll fix it during submittals.”
Dale Hurttgam, NCARB, AIA,LEED AP, CSI
Senior Member
Username: dwhurttgam

Post Number: 128
Registered: 10-2005


Posted on Friday, February 10, 2017 - 01:02 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

I have an addition. We ask our Project Architects to make either a hard (mostly electronic now) Material Data Book for reference for the project and for basis for specifications.

Many insert a whole brochure or data sheet and think they are done - no model selection, option selection or other necessary indications to clearly identify the product or system to be specified.
Ellis C. Whitby, PE, CSI, AIA, LEED
Senior Member
Username: ecwhitby

Post Number: 287
Registered: 03-2003
Posted on Monday, February 13, 2017 - 03:12 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Dale: too true.
Sheldon Wolfe
Senior Member
Username: sheldon_wolfe

Post Number: 953
Registered: 01-2003


Posted on Monday, February 13, 2017 - 03:21 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

As it is, as it was, and as it evermore shall be...
David J. Wyatt, CDT
Senior Member
Username: david_j_wyatt_cdt

Post Number: 169
Registered: 03-2011
Posted on Tuesday, February 14, 2017 - 08:48 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Dale,

How ironic it is that we on the design side do the very things we excoriate contractors for doing when making submittals.

In thinking about this, I recall Kurt Vonnegut's assertion, "How embarrassing it is to be human!"
Brian Payne, AIA
Senior Member
Username: brian_payne

Post Number: 69
Registered: 01-2014


Posted on Thursday, February 23, 2017 - 12:21 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Today I was told by a PM that they were concerned that I had made assumptions when writing the spec for their project.

Facepalm!
Liz O'Sullivan
Senior Member
Username: liz_osullivan

Post Number: 223
Registered: 10-2011


Posted on Thursday, February 23, 2017 - 12:34 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Oh, wow, Brian. That is amazing.
Sometimes I don't ask questions in time, and sometimes I don't get answers in time, and have to make some assumptions at the last minute. When I do, I try to summarize in an email the last-minute assumptions that I made - anything that the project architect wouldn't be able to figure out the reason for. Sometimes there's 1. Sometimes there are more like 10.
ken hercenberg
Senior Member
Username: khercenberg

Post Number: 1058
Registered: 12-2006


Posted on Thursday, February 23, 2017 - 01:10 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

As opposed to issuing works of fiction because designers either can't make decisions or won't communicate them?
J. Peter Jordan
Senior Member
Username: jpjordan

Post Number: 944
Registered: 05-2004
Posted on Thursday, February 23, 2017 - 04:16 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Specifiction?
J. Peter Jordan, FCSI, AIA, CCS, LEED AP, SCIP

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration