Author |
Message |
Michael Chusid, RA FCSI CCS Senior Member Username: michael_chusid
Post Number: 45 Registered: 10-2003
| Posted on Monday, June 08, 2015 - 01:35 am: | |
An article in the June 2015 issue of Construction Specifier describes patterns for carpet tile installation. It illustrates a pattern it calls "ASHLAR". (You can see an illustration of pattern at http://tinyurl.com/q2q79qu). The pattern has nothing to do with the established meaning of "ashlar" from the stone industry. - Does this bother anyone besides me? - Is there a better, alternative term in use? Michael Chusid, RA FCSI CCS www.chusid.com www.buildingproduct.guru |
Jerome J. Lazar, RA, CCS, CSI, SCIP Senior Member Username: lazarcitec
Post Number: 1379 Registered: 05-2003
| Posted on Monday, June 08, 2015 - 01:40 am: | |
Michael, the only thing disturbing is that you are asking about carpet patterns at 1:35am. How about "ashlar-like" or better yet better I go back to sleep. Good night Michael. |
Dave Metzger Senior Member Username: davemetzger
Post Number: 586 Registered: 07-2001
| Posted on Monday, June 08, 2015 - 12:20 pm: | |
"Ashlar" is a recognized term in the carpet industry, for installation of modular carpet. The Carpet and Rug Institute, in their "CRI Carpet Installation Standard", discusses "installation geometry (monolithic, ashlar, quarter turn, etc.)" I see no problem with the same term being used for two different trades--even though the carpet use obviously derives from the stone use. There are bigger issues to be bothered about. |
Louis Medcalf, FCSI, CCS Senior Member Username: louis_medcalf
Post Number: 57 Registered: 11-2010
| Posted on Monday, June 08, 2015 - 04:48 pm: | |
You mean "running bond" pattern? ;-> |
|