4specs.com    4specs.com Home Page

Product Material Safety (post constru... Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

4specs Discussion Forum » Archive - Specifications Discussions #6 » Product Material Safety (post construction) « Previous Next »

Author Message
Jerome J. Lazar, RA, CCS, CSI
Senior Member
Username: lazarcitec

Post Number: 1939
Registered: 05-2003
Posted on Friday, October 26, 2018 - 05:50 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

A client has requested I review materials selected by another Consultant no longer working on the project. These are interior finish products which I reviewed along with the Architect and Owner's Representative, some products received a thumbs up, some a thumbs down and were eliminated from the project. The Architect would like me to issue a "formal document" advising that the materials are safe to use according to industry standards. I am not comfortable with providing any document that declares a product is safe. Any suggestions?
Greta Eckhardt
Senior Member
Username: gretaeckhardt

Post Number: 85
Registered: 08-2013


Posted on Friday, October 26, 2018 - 07:33 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Jerome, I agree with your concern about making a statement about product safety. One approach might be to look at the product data to see whether they have been certified according to any of the "green" testing protocols, such as Greenguard, CRI Green Label Plus, Cradle-to-Cradle, etc. and make a list of which products have which certifications. These certifications do not prove that a product is "safe" but they indicate that some level of evaluation or testing has been done to evaluate potential toxic ingredients. When you submit the list of products/certifications, you don't need to use the word "safe", just offer references where the client can read more about what the certifications mean.
Jerome J. Lazar, RA, CCS, CSI
Senior Member
Username: lazarcitec

Post Number: 1940
Registered: 05-2003
Posted on Friday, October 26, 2018 - 11:35 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Greta, this is a Condominium, there is no Green Building Criteria.

Good suggestion though.
Mark Gilligan SE,
Senior Member
Username: mark_gilligan

Post Number: 868
Registered: 10-2007
Posted on Friday, October 26, 2018 - 12:30 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Do you have a contractual obligation to make such a statement?

Suggest that you provide the information you have and defer to the project architect. Ask them to define safe.
Jerome J. Lazar, RA, CCS, CSI
Senior Member
Username: lazarcitec

Post Number: 1941
Registered: 05-2003
Posted on Friday, October 26, 2018 - 01:05 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

The "safe" word/request came from the Project Architect.
Jerome J. Lazar, RA, CCS, CSI
Senior Member
Username: lazarcitec

Post Number: 1942
Registered: 05-2003
Posted on Friday, October 26, 2018 - 01:09 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Mark, the question could pertain to any project, as Specifiers, are we selecting products that are safe for the user?

Actually, I do not select products, contractually the selection of products is the responsibility of the Architect.
Michael Chusid, RA FCSI CCS
Senior Member
Username: michael_chusid

Post Number: 434
Registered: 10-2003


Posted on Friday, October 26, 2018 - 02:22 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Most products that are covered by industry standards are "safe to use" when used according to industry standards.

However,
1. Many products are not covered by standards.
2. Most standards cover things that do not affect safety (such as colorfastness).
3. Most safety failures are not due to product issues but to their incorrect use in building systems and assemblies.
4. Many of the products you specify are according to reference standards; the contractor is picking actual products. You should not take responsibility for that.
Michael Chusid, RA FCSI CCS 1-818-219-4937
www.chusid.com www.buildingproduct.guru
Ronald L. Geren, FCSI Lifetime Member, AIA, CCS, CCCA, CSC, SCIP
Senior Member
Username: specman

Post Number: 1520
Registered: 03-2003


Posted on Friday, October 26, 2018 - 03:54 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

My professional liability insurer recommended I add the following to my agreements, which I did:

"Certifications: RLGA shall not be required to sign any documents, no matter by whom requested, that would result in RLGA’s having to certify, guaranty, or warrant the existence of conditions that RLGA cannot ascertain."
Ron Geren, FCSI Lifetime Member, AIA, CCS, CCCA, CSC, SCIP
David G. Axt, CCS, CSI ,SCIP
Senior Member
Username: david_axt

Post Number: 1736
Registered: 03-2002


Posted on Friday, October 26, 2018 - 03:54 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

I too am wondering what the word "safe" means. Slip resistant? Fireproof? Structurally sound? Bulletproof? Low or no VOC's? No Red List materials? Fit for human consumption?

What happens if you do the research on the building products and find that some of the products are not "safe"?

Taking responsibility (and liability) for another person's selections sounds like a really bad idea.
David G. Axt, CCS, CSI, SCIP
Specifications Consultant
Axt Consulting LLC
Jerome J. Lazar, RA, CCS, CSI
Senior Member
Username: lazarcitec

Post Number: 1943
Registered: 05-2003
Posted on Friday, October 26, 2018 - 03:58 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

The Architect has withdrawn the word "safe", unfortunately this is a condo, so at some point the Condo Vultures will ask.
Jerome J. Lazar, RA, CCS, CSI
Senior Member
Username: lazarcitec

Post Number: 1944
Registered: 05-2003
Posted on Friday, October 26, 2018 - 03:59 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Well at least we have no Chinese Drywall, Chinese Porcelain yes.
Mark Gilligan SE,
Senior Member
Username: mark_gilligan

Post Number: 869
Registered: 10-2007
Posted on Friday, October 26, 2018 - 05:46 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Safe is a relative term.

Safe against what hazards?

What is an acceptable failure rate? 0 is not an acceptable answer.

How will you measure failure?
John Bunzick, CCS, CCCA, LEED AP
Senior Member
Username: bunzick

Post Number: 1769
Registered: 03-2002
Posted on Sunday, October 28, 2018 - 03:28 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

About the only thing I can think of that can be done here (short of saying "no") is to ask them what standard(s) they want to conform to, and then check to see if they meet that. Probably, they have no idea what standard would apply. I had a project years ago (before current thinking on indoor air quality existed) where the public client was very worried about it. They hired an industrial hygienist to review all submittals. Maybe they can go that route.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration