4specs.com    4specs.com Home Page

Hyperlinks in specs Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

4specs Discussion Forum » Archive - Specifications Discussions #6 » Hyperlinks in specs « Previous Next »

Author Message
David J. Wyatt, CDT
Senior Member
Username: david_j_wyatt_cdt

Post Number: 178
Registered: 03-2011
Posted on Thursday, May 04, 2017 - 07:52 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

A search for this topic yielded no results. I work for a firm that likes to see hyperlinks in specs, particularly for standards development entities like ASTM and UL. Since we still issue paper documents, I'm having a hard time understanding the value of this. However, at the ripe young age of 60, I am swilling to learn from those who know better.

Thoughts, anyone? Thanks in advance.
Jeffrey Wilson CSI CCS SCIP
Senior Member
Username: wilsonconsulting

Post Number: 210
Registered: 03-2006


Posted on Thursday, May 04, 2017 - 09:48 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

What potion are you swilling to learn? I would like to get my hands on some of that. I also turn 60 this year, and if it helps you, I am swilling to try!
Jeffrey Wilson CCS CSI SCIP
Wilson Consulting Inc
Ardmore PA
Jeffrey Wilson CSI CCS SCIP
Senior Member
Username: wilsonconsulting

Post Number: 211
Registered: 03-2006


Posted on Thursday, May 04, 2017 - 09:51 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Without benefit of David's swilling potion, I can't imagine an advantage to hyperlinks in a paper document. Perhaps the goal is to set groundwork for the future paperless work flow for specifications and construction project delivery.
Jeffrey Wilson CCS CSI SCIP
Wilson Consulting Inc
Ardmore PA
David J. Wyatt, CDT
Senior Member
Username: david_j_wyatt_cdt

Post Number: 179
Registered: 03-2011
Posted on Thursday, May 04, 2017 - 09:55 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Jeff,

Ha! Thanks for spotting the Freudian slop in my message. It took me a couple readings to get your meaning.

Fire - Ready - Aim!
Liz O'Sullivan
Senior Member
Username: liz_osullivan

Post Number: 225
Registered: 10-2011


Posted on Thursday, May 04, 2017 - 09:57 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

I think there's a disadvantage to having hyperlinks in a document that is to be printed on actual paper - the text can become hard to read if it's underlined. I try to remove hyperlinks unless I know it's going to bidders as a PDF.
John Bunzick, CCS, CCCA, LEED AP
Senior Member
Username: bunzick

Post Number: 1713
Registered: 03-2002
Posted on Thursday, May 04, 2017 - 12:22 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Most specs are probably distributed via PDF these days, so the hyperlinks could allow a construction team member to go directly to additional information. However, in the case of standards that are not available for free, such a link could only go to the summary or to the overall standard body's website
Greta Eckhardt
Senior Member
Username: gretaeckhardt

Post Number: 57
Registered: 08-2013


Posted on Friday, May 05, 2017 - 09:32 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

I think hyperlinks in electronic documents can be helpful, but I have a couple of comments:

One thing I don't like about them is that we reserve blue underlined formatting for added text when we track changes, but that could be worked around. MasterSpec colors their hyperlinks to manufacturers in orange which helps.

Links to ASTM standards won't work smoothly since one must have a subscription or pay in order to view them on-line - this is also true of some but not all other standards.
Guest (Unregistered Guest)
Unregistered guest
Posted on Friday, May 05, 2017 - 10:27 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

When you include hyperlinks in your specifications, do you include language in Div 01 clarifying that any links and linked material is for information only and that it is not part of the contract documents? Or, are the hyperlinks meant to link information that becomes part of the contract?
Gail Ann J. Goldstead, AIA, CSI, CDT, LEED AP, BD+C
Senior Member
Username: ggoldstead

Post Number: 8
Registered: 03-2015


Posted on Friday, May 05, 2017 - 10:38 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Hyperlinks are theoretically helpful when you are looking at a PDF of the specification on your computer. It's wonderful to hit a link and the exact PD sheet you need pops up.

Unfortunately, these links aren't always durable and reliable. Basic hyperlinks to a manufacturer's website is often frustrating because each manufacturer organizes their website differently and frequently it's very time-consuming to find the specific data you are looking for. It's better to actually put the PD sheet into the specification, if necessary, and hopefully the product is still available when the contractor needs it.
Gail Goldstead
Steven Bruneel, AIA, CSI-CDT, LEED-AP, EDAC
Senior Member
Username: redseca2

Post Number: 586
Registered: 12-2006


Posted on Friday, May 05, 2017 - 02:34 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Durable and Reliable: Our office primarily does major healthcare projects. I first compiled the specifications for a large project that is just now nearing completion in 2008.

So often for us, the company we specified a product from no longer exists, let alone their web based information. That is the main reason we limit hyperlinks to truly obscure, often "no known equals" products.

Also, because of our heathcare specialization, we are often a part of a large integrated project delivery team with a shared cloud based document repository. That is a good place for product data sheets.

We also need to be careful that we don't get bitten when trying to feed helpful information. You need to make clear that you are providing the product data sheets as a convenience, so you don't get thanked for your efforts with RFI's requesting the same for products you didn't include.
Brett Scarfino (Unregistered Guest)
Unregistered guest
Posted on Friday, May 05, 2017 - 03:10 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

two categories:
1) groups/organizations/institutes.
2) manufacturers and products.

The prior rarely changes names or website format, but they generally charge for their content.

The later commonly changes names/products/revamps website for marketing purposes, though their content is generally free and readily available. Here is an example I just came by this week: http://www.vitroglazings.com/en-US/Glass.aspx *personal bookmark updated.

So, I would see limited value in providing anything beyond the domain name (noting that could even change, example above). I also avoid clicking hyperlinks (or attempting to type them in) in favor of googling what I need / finding the latest "published" information. You never know how the IT or Web-admin is handling archived information; your direct link to something could be retrievable, but outdated.
Michael Chusid, RA FCSI CCS
Senior Member
Username: michael_chusid

Post Number: 270
Registered: 10-2003


Posted on Saturday, May 06, 2017 - 10:24 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

If you do link to astm or other standards, make sure you link to the edition of the standard that applies to the contract.
Michael Chusid, RA FCSI CCS
www.chusid.com www.buildingproduct.guru 818-219-4937
David J. Wyatt, CDT
Senior Member
Username: david_j_wyatt_cdt

Post Number: 181
Registered: 03-2011
Posted on Monday, May 08, 2017 - 10:23 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Thank you for all of the useful feedback. Steve Bruneel's comment that we sometimes suffer when we try to be too helpful is well-taken.

At this point my position is that hyperlinks look impressive but they can fail about as often as they succeed.

I want to be helpful to the end-users of the documents, but I am not going to chew their food for them.
J. Peter Jordan
Senior Member
Username: jpjordan

Post Number: 959
Registered: 05-2004
Posted on Monday, May 08, 2017 - 10:52 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

David-- The last line in your last post should be today's aphorism.
J. Peter Jordan, FCSI, AIA, CCS, LEED AP, SCIP
RH (Hank) Sweers II RA CSI CCS
Senior Member
Username: rhsweers2

Post Number: 19
Registered: 08-2005
Posted on Tuesday, May 16, 2017 - 03:25 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

I have prefered manufacturer's reps prepare hardware sets, and they typically include hyperlinks in the Word file. As long as I don't eliminate them by copy/paste with "unformated" text (which is actually my preference), the Project Manangers/Architects are still able to use them - even in a printed PDF file within their tablets when on a project site (no need to print!). I didn't realize that until they asked why the links were no longer "active" on one spec. You DO have to manage the PDF export to make that happen though.
Phil Kabza
Senior Member
Username: phil_kabza

Post Number: 583
Registered: 12-2002


Posted on Wednesday, May 17, 2017 - 01:27 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

The eventual failure of hyperlinks embedded in specs as manufacturers change products and URLs reinforce the fact that specifications age, and should not be dragged from project to project over the years.
Dave Metzger
Senior Member
Username: davemetzger

Post Number: 688
Registered: 07-2001
Posted on Wednesday, May 17, 2017 - 01:36 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Can we call the first project manual in which hyperlinks and URL's were embedded, the UR-specification?

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration