4specs.com    4specs.com Home Page

Dust Control Outdoors Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

4specs Discussion Forum » Archive - Specifications Discussions #6 » Dust Control Outdoors « Previous Next »

Author Message
Jerome J. Lazar, RA, CCS, CSI, SCIP
Senior Member
Username: lazarcitec

Post Number: 1499
Registered: 05-2003
Posted on Saturday, October 24, 2015 - 04:22 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

I am preparing specs for a large expansion to a resort in Barbados, the Resort owner wants extraordinary means specified to control dust traveling from the expansion site to the existing resort next door. Other than enclosing the expansion site in a dust cover, anyone have any suggestions on wording to add to the standard Execution Requirements of Division 1.
Ron Beard CCS
Senior Member
Username: rm_beard_ccs

Post Number: 430
Registered: 10-2002


Posted on Sunday, October 25, 2015 - 07:44 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Either build upwind or install some Big Ass Fans <www.bigassfans.com>.

:-)
"Fast is good, but accurate is better."
.............Wyatt Earp
Greta Eckhardt
Senior Member
Username: gretaeckhardt

Post Number: 32
Registered: 08-2013


Posted on Monday, October 26, 2015 - 10:19 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Construction dust would be generated by demolition and earthwork. For earthwork, it should be possible to require the contractor to cover loose soil that has been stockpiled, and "wet down" loose soil and construction-generated dust. The civil engineer should have language about this in their Division 31 specifications. For demolition, include language in the Division 02 demolition specifications requiring that the contractor use wet sawing where concrete and masonry needs to be cut and keep the construction site clean. In both Division 02 and 31 the specifications can require that the contractor submit their proposed methods for controlling dust - they may have other methods at their disposal.
John Bunzick, CCS, CCCA, LEED AP
Senior Member
Username: bunzick

Post Number: 1648
Registered: 03-2002
Posted on Monday, October 26, 2015 - 10:49 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

You can also require truck wash stations that clean dirt off wheels and undercarriages to limit dust on local access roads, along with regular road-sweeping.
David E Lorenzini
Senior Member
Username: deloren

Post Number: 171
Registered: 04-2000


Posted on Monday, October 26, 2015 - 10:51 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Here is a product I have used for dust control:

U. Synthetic Soil Binder: Durasoil synthetic organic dust control agent, as manufactured by Soilworks, LLC, or other standard manufacturer's spray on adhesives designed for dust suppression.
1. Product shall be non-toxic, non-disapating, non-curing, colorless, and odorless.
2. Product shall be capable of being applied in any weather conditions.
David Lorenzini, FCSI, CCS
Architectural Resources Co.
Jerome J. Lazar, RA, CCS, CSI, SCIP
Senior Member
Username: lazarcitec

Post Number: 1500
Registered: 05-2003
Posted on Monday, October 26, 2015 - 11:10 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Thanks Greta, John, & David much appreciated feedback.

Ron, there are no words for my gratitude for your recommendation, I think I will pass though, I want to keep this client.
Ronald L. Geren, FCSI, AIA, CCS, CCCA, SCIP
Senior Member
Username: specman

Post Number: 1357
Registered: 03-2003


Posted on Monday, October 26, 2015 - 11:16 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Dust control is not impossible, but it does slow construction progress and add cost. Here in Maricopa County, Arizona the dust control requirements are very strict. Just driving a vehicle down a dirt road can get you a citation if you create dust.
Ron Geren, FCSI, AIA, CCS, CCCA, SCIP
www.specsandcodes.com
Wayne Yancey
Senior Member
Username: wayne_yancey

Post Number: 760
Registered: 01-2008


Posted on Monday, October 26, 2015 - 11:25 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Isn't this why water was invented?
Seriously, I had never heard of the product David has used. Aside from specifying dust control products, isn't dust control a means, methods, and sequencing responsibility issue for the contractor. Perhaps there is local AHJ or EPA requirements for dust control.
Jerome J. Lazar, RA, CCS, CSI, SCIP
Senior Member
Username: lazarcitec

Post Number: 1501
Registered: 05-2003
Posted on Monday, October 26, 2015 - 11:32 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Wayne, Ron, this is Barbados, EPA does not scare these guys like it does us in the States. The Resort wants extraordinary methods used to insure their guests don't get dust in their Mai-Tais.
Wayne Yancey
Senior Member
Username: wayne_yancey

Post Number: 761
Registered: 01-2008


Posted on Monday, October 26, 2015 - 11:36 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Jerome,

I suggest you look to existing requirements for dust control found in the US. EPA and jurisdictions like Maricopa County may be a good starting point.
Wayne Yancey
Senior Member
Username: wayne_yancey

Post Number: 762
Registered: 01-2008


Posted on Monday, October 26, 2015 - 11:40 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Jerome,

Here is one source of information
http://water.epa.gov/polwaste/npdes/swbmp/Dust-Control.cfm

You may find something in this website to aid your dust control requirement specification.
Ronald L. Geren, FCSI, AIA, CCS, CCCA, SCIP
Senior Member
Username: specman

Post Number: 1358
Registered: 03-2003


Posted on Monday, October 26, 2015 - 11:50 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Jerome:

Yes, Barbados may not have the EPA or Maricopa County regulations, but you have an owner requirement, which is just as binding on you as a governmental requirement (albeit without the mandated heavy fines).

Here's Rule 310 from Maricopa County: https://maricopa.gov/aq/divisions/planning_analysis/rules/docs/310-1001.pdf
Ron Geren, FCSI, AIA, CCS, CCCA, SCIP
www.specsandcodes.com
Jerome J. Lazar, RA, CCS, CSI, SCIP
Senior Member
Username: lazarcitec

Post Number: 1502
Registered: 05-2003
Posted on Monday, October 26, 2015 - 12:25 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

David, the Resort client nixed your idea, apparently there are too many chemicals being used there as is, they want to keep it simple.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration