4specs.com    4specs.com Home Page

Visual Mockup for concrete Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

4specs Discussion Forum » Archive - Specifications Discussions #6 » Visual Mockup for concrete « Previous Next »

Author Message
Robin E. Snyder
Senior Member
Username: robin

Post Number: 612
Registered: 08-2004
Posted on Wednesday, July 29, 2015 - 11:36 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Is there any standard for distance for viewing visual mockups for concrete? In this case, the smaller sample (2 x 2) was approved for color, but the full-size mockup doesn't match. Contractor is claiming that it "matches" when viewed from 20 feet away, which, allegedly is industry standard. I can't find anything to support or negate.
Ellis C. Whitby, PE, CSI, AIA, LEEDŽ AP
Senior Member
Username: ecwhitby

Post Number: 259
Registered: 03-2003
Posted on Wednesday, July 29, 2015 - 12:29 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

I believe that PCI MNL 117 references 20 feet as a minimum viewing distance,
Steven Bruneel, AIA, CSI-CDT, LEED-AP, EDAC
Senior Member
Username: redseca2

Post Number: 502
Registered: 12-2006


Posted on Wednesday, July 29, 2015 - 02:55 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

It can be difficult to get a small (2 x 2) cast-in-place concrete sample that accurately shows the results you will get in the field.

The actual field installation is measured in cubic yards while the sample was probably made in a very small quantity - one teaspoon or two?
George A. Everding, AIA, CSI, CCS, CCCA
Senior Member
Username: geverding

Post Number: 800
Registered: 11-2004


Posted on Wednesday, July 29, 2015 - 03:16 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Specifically, PCI MNL 117 article 1.5.4 "Visual Mockups and Initial Production Approval of Architectural Finishes". There is also a commentary paragraph adjacent to the article.
George A. Everding, AIA, CSI, CCS, CCCA
Senior Member
Username: geverding

Post Number: 801
Registered: 11-2004


Posted on Wednesday, July 29, 2015 - 03:20 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Also 2.9
Michael Chusid, RA FCSI CCS
Senior Member
Username: michael_chusid

Post Number: 64
Registered: 10-2003


Posted on Wednesday, July 29, 2015 - 06:50 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Assume production concrete WILL NOT match small samples. Concrete color varies with minute differences in curing method and time, w/cm ratio, form surfaces, etc. This is especially true for site cast concrete. See my article from Construction Specifier at http://www.daviscolors.com/Downloads/Literature/DC618.pdf
Michael Chusid, RA FCSI CCS
www.chusid.com www.buildingproduct.guru
Guest (Unregistered Guest)
Unregistered guest
Posted on Thursday, July 30, 2015 - 11:53 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

Anyone know if the ACI is similar to the PCI for mockup viewing? What if this isn't precast?
Ronald L. Geren, FCSI, AIA, CCS, CCCA, SCIP
Senior Member
Username: specman

Post Number: 1330
Registered: 03-2003


Posted on Thursday, July 30, 2015 - 12:29 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

I have a 2007 edition of the ACI Manual of Practice, and ACI 303R-04 "Guide to Cast-in-Place Architectural Concrete Practice" states in Section 2.1.1 the following:

"General acceptance criteria--Architecturally acceptable concrete surfaces should be aesthetically compatible with minimal color and texture variations and minimal surface defects when viewed at a distance of approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more as agreed upon by the architect, owner, and contractor, or as otherwise specified."
Ron Geren, FCSI, AIA, CCS, CCCA, SCIP
www.specsandcodes.com
Sheldon Wolfe
Senior Member
Username: sheldon_wolfe

Post Number: 872
Registered: 01-2003


Posted on Thursday, July 30, 2015 - 03:06 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

"as agreed upon by the architect, owner, and contractor"

Good one, ACI!
George A. Everding, AIA, CSI, CCS, CCCA
Senior Member
Username: geverding

Post Number: 802
Registered: 11-2004


Posted on Thursday, July 30, 2015 - 03:33 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post

This illustrates that reference standards are minimum standards. As one of my mentors, Ed Glock, is fond of pointing out, ASTM C90 allows a chip the size of a quarter in the face of an exposed concrete block.

Is this acceptable? It depends on the project, how the block is being used, what the owner's and architect's expectations are...

But the reality is that if you just specify ASTM C90 without stipulating stricter requirements, don't be surprised to see chips in 5% of your units. Read and understand the reference standards in your specification.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration